A helicopter and a RAF jet came close to a “potentially disastrous” crash above a Scottish island, the report of an official probe released today has revealed. 
Investigators said the incident highlighted the need of 
the previously cancelled Tornado Collision Warning System which is now 
planned to be fitted to the fleet this year.
Earlier this year it was revealed that a warning system which could have prevented a fatal crash between
 two Tornado jets in Scotland in 2012 was cancelled twelve years after a
 commitment to its implementation had first been made by defence chiefs.
 
Flight
 Lieutenant Adam Sanders, Squadron Leader Samuel Bailey and Flight 
Lieutenant Hywel Poole were killed when the two Tornado GR4s, based at 
RAF Lossiemouth, collided over the Moray Firth.
It
 was revealed in December, in a written answer from Tory defence 
equipment minister Philip Dunne, that a collision warning system costing
 around £60 million for the fighter jets was considered four years 
before the fatal crash and that the Government decided in January 2012, 
six months before the crash, to tender for a different system developed 
by BAE which was £6 million cheaper.
But  Angus Robertson, the SNP
 MP for Moray, revealed that a Freedom of Information request had 
disclosed that the then Conservative Secretary of State for Defence, Dr 
Liam Fox, cancelled its installation a full twelve years after a 
commitment had been made to do so against the advice of the Military 
Aviation Authority. The MAA had warned that, without installation of the
 system, they would not be able to certify the risk of collision as 
being acceptable
Near miss
The
 latest near miss incident involving a Tornado jet to come before the UK
 Airpox Board happened on April 10 about 1.5 miles north west of the 
Hebridean island of Gigha
The Tornado was conducting a low-level 
tactical formation sortie below the 4000 feet cloud base. As he did a 
right turn he noticed the helicopter about 500 metres away.
The 
Tornado was manoeuvred hard into the turn and descended to avoid the 
Eurocopter AS355. The helicopter was flying straight-and-level and was 
not seen to manoeuvre. 
The Tornado pilot assessed the risk of collision as ‘medium.’
The
 helicopter pilot was flying at about 1000ft when he saw a grey Tornado 
to his left, coming from the north, just as it broke away to its right 
and flew behind him.
He assessed the risk of collision as “potentially disastrous.”
The
 UK Airprox Board, which investigates near misses, heard that neither 
aircraft was fitted with an Airborne Collision Avoidance System (ACAS) 
or True Air Speed (TAS) nor were the pilots in receipt of an Air Traffic
 Service (ATS).
“The only effective barrier remaining was lookout.
 On this occasion it appears that the Tornado pilot was the first to 
visually acquire the other aircraft (albeit late) and immediately took 
action to resolve the conflict and increase separation - a manoeuvre 
that highlighted his aircraft to the helicopter pilot. Once again this 
incident serves as a reminder that effective lookout is crucial....” HQ 
Air Command told the investigation.
Risk of collision
The
 Board said the cause of the airprox was a late sighting by both pilots 
and assessed the risk of collision as B - the second highest rating 
where safety was not assured.
“The Board first assessed the 
actions of the pilots involved and quickly determined that the cause of 
the Airprox had been a late sighting by both pilots,” it said.
“Not
 being within ATS coverage, and with neither aircraft having electronic 
aids to collision avoidance, both pilots were relying exclusively on 
‘see-and-avoid’.
“The Tornado pilot did not see the helicopter 
until it passed through his field of view during his right-hand turn, 
and the AS355 pilot did not see the Tornado until its pilot broke away 
from him.
“The Board postulated that the reasons for the late 
sightings could have been that the Tornado pilot might have been 
concentrating his lookout on regaining formation integrity as he 
manoeuvred, whilst the AS355 pilot might have been in a state of 
low-arousal given his apparently benign flight conditions and low 
complexity transit task.
“This was not to criticize either of the
 pilots but rather to emphasise the importance of effective all-round 
lookout at all times. In addition, members noted that, weather and task 
permitting, by remaining above 2000ft, airspace users would avoid the 
majority of military low-level fast-jet traffic and they heartily 
encouraged those conducting simple transits to consider this as an 
option.
“Given the difficulties of seeing a grey camouflaged 
Tornado against the sea and a relatively slow-moving helicopter on a 
constant bearing, the Board opined that an effective mitigation would 
also have been provided if one or both aircraft had been fitted with a 
TAS or ACAS; in this respect, the Board was heartened that the 
previously cancelled Tornado Collision Warning System (CWS) was now 
planned for introduction to the Tornado fleet during the current fiscal 
year.
“The Board felt that the conditions and dynamics of the 
event were pertinent in assessing its risk. Although the Tornado pilot 
had reacted correctly to the presence of the helicopter, his closing 
speed and late sighting reduced his ability to achieve an appreciable 
increase in separation.
“The Board considered that neither pilot 
had been in a position to achieve timely and effective collision 
avoidance, and that safety margins had been much reduced below the 
norm.”
- Source:  http://www.scotsman.com
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

No comments:
Post a Comment