Wednesday, March 22, 2017

Federal Law Enforcement Remind U.S. Airports, Airlines They Are Terror Targets

Federal law enforcement has warned America's airports and airlines that they remain top targets for terrorists because of their symbolic value, "inherent accessibility, and the presence of large crowds in unsecure areas," according to a new government memo obtained by NBC News.

The "law enforcement sensitive" memo, sent Tuesday to the nation's passenger airlines, law enforcement agencies and many of the nation's nearly 20,000 airports, reminds the airline industry that "terrorists outside the U.S. remain intent on attacking airports."

Written by the FBI, Department of Homeland Security, and the National Counterterrorism Center, the nine-page document comes on the heels of a new ban on passengers carrying electronic devices aboard flights from some foreign airports because of terror fears, but does not address that threat.

The memo, however, does address recent mass casualty terror attacks on foreign airports and airliners, including deadly airport attacks in Turkey and Belgium and the downing of a passenger jet over Egypt in 2015 via a bomb allegedly planted by ISIS. 

 The threats listed in the memo include:

- "Artfully concealed weapons and explosives" loaded onto both passenger and cargo airlines.

- The "insider threat" posed by airport employees giving outsiders access to secure areas and planes. "In addition, cybersecurity should be part of any insider threat program, which may include appropriate vetting of personnel with access to critical or secure systems and users with account-management privileges."

- Drones. The memo reminds first responders to report suspicious drone activity.

The memo suggests additional security measures for the industry, including:

- Providing security "training to service providers, such as taxi/cab drivers, cleaners, cargo carriers, and parking attendants, to serve as force multipliers in identifying and reporting suspicious activity."

- The use of additional technology to monitor sensitive areas. For instance, "consider using license plate readers at key locations, such as departures, arrivals, and parking garages."

- Using a guard tower or towers along the perimeter of an airport so there is an elevated line of sight of the airport's perimeter.

The document also examines tools airport officials can use to communicate with the public about terror threats, including a cellphone alerting system that can send messages to phones near and in the airport. 

Source:  http://www.nbcnews.com

Will St. Louis Lambert Airport go private? Mayor submits preliminary application to Federal Aviation Administratio

ST. LOUIS, MO (KTVI) – Will Lambert Airport go private? A release from St. Louis Mayor Francis Slay says that the city has submitted a preliminary application to the Federal Aviation Administration’s Airport Privatization Pilot Program.

The FAA says that the program is designed to allow, “Select U.S. airports to generate access to sources of private capital for airport improvement and development. The results aim to improve operational efficiencies, allow for private sector innovation, and free up airport revenue for other municipal purposes, while retaining full ownership of the airport.”

Mayor Slay says in the release that if the FAA accepts the pre-application then the city can explore whether this is the right option for St. Louis.

“We owe it to taxpayers and the airport’s users to reap the maximum benefits of the airport, and we believe this pilot program has the potential to do just that by improving airport revenue through private partner innovation, diversification, and improved use of land assets,” the Mayor says in the release.

Commercial service airports like St. Louis Lambert, can only be leased, not sold. Under the APPP, the City would retain full ownership of the airport. Day-to-day operations would be turned over to a private sector operator that would lease the facility.

The FAA could approve St. Louis’ preliminary application sometime this spring. This is the first step in a lengthy, competitive selection process. If the city moves forward then the final transaction would require approval by the FAA, airlines operating out of St. Louis Lambert, as well as necessary local approvals.

Source:  http://fox2now.com

Boeing sets date for first 787-10 flight from North Charleston



Boeing Co. has set a date for taking its first 787-10 on its first check ride.

The company announced Wednesday that it plans to fly the North Charleston-made jet on March 31, subject to favorable weather conditions and other factors. It will be broadcast live on www.boeing.com.  

The jet made its public debut last month, the same day President Donald Trump visited Boeing South Carolina and gave a speech with the plane in the background. 

The "Dash 10" aircraft is the newest and largest member of the Dreamliner stable. It's made exclusively in North Charleston. Boeing assembles the other two versions of the 787 locally and in Everett, Washington.

Source: http://www.postandcourier.com

Man accused of stealing more than $1M in aviation equipment from Southeast Texas airports




SOUTHEAST TEXAS — The man accused of stealing more than a $1 million in aviation equipment from multiple airports across Southeast Texas remains behind bars at a jail in Conroe.

Chambers County Sheriff Brian C. Hawthorne on Tuesday identified Hugo Edmundo Urrea, 21, as a suspect in the theft of equipment from the Winnie airport on March 10, after he his arrest by the Conroe Police Department.

Urrea, of Houston, is accused of stealing more than $225,000 from the Jack Brooks airport in Jefferson County.

He is accused of stealing more than $30,000 worth of aviation equipment from several airplanes at the Winnie airport.

Investigators say the Beaumont Municipal Airport, two airports in Chambers County, two in Harris County, an airport in Conroe and an Avionics business in Conroe had been victims of similar thefts during the same time period.

Urrea was arrested in Conroe, allegedly in possession of the stolen property. Jefferson County investigators, working with the Conroe PD investigators, interviewed Urrea, who they say gave a full confession to the crimes.

Source:   http://kfdm.com

BEAUMONT — A suspect arrested in Conroe has been linked to thefts at airports in multiple Southeast Texas counties, the Jefferson County Sheriff's Office said Friday in a news release.

Police officials are not naming the suspect, but the person is believed to have broken into a hangar and burglarized several planes and a vehicle inside the hanger at Jack Brooks Regional Airport last week.

Here's the sheriff's office statement:

On Saturday, March 11, 2017, an airplane sitting on the tarmac at the Southeast Texas Regional Airport was broken into. The suspect then broke into a hanger and burglarized several planes and a vehicle inside the hangar. Evidence discovered at the scene assisted in locating the suspect.

Investigators Deputy Mark Holmes and Deputy Danny Powell further discovered that two Airports in Chambers County, two Airports in Harris County, The Beaumont Municipal Airport, an Airport in Conroe as well as an Avionics business in Conroe had also been victims of similar thefts during the same time period.

The suspect was arrested in Conroe in possession of the stolen property. JCSO Investigators, working with the Conroe PD Investigators interviewed the suspect who gave a full confession to the crimes.

The loss at the Southeast Texas Regional Airport reached in excess of $225,000.00. All property has been recovered and will be returned to the rightful owners. Total loss to all Airports and the Avionics Business is in excess of 1.2 Million Dollars.

The suspect remains in the Montgomery County Jail on Felony Theft charges. His name will not be released at this time due to the ongoing investigation.

Source:  http://kfdm.com

Woman arrested in fatal shooting near Bakersfield Municipal Airport (L45), Kern County, California

BAKERSFIELD, California -   The woman arrested in connection with a deadly shooting in South Bakersfield will be charged with first-degree murder on Thursday. 

Deputies arrested 30-year-old Krystal Wandick in connection with the Friday night deadly shooting of a man in south Bakersfield.

On March 17, 2017, Kern County Sheriff’s Office Homicide Detectives began investigating the shooting death of a male victim in the 4200 block of Gordon Street. 

After conducting multiple interviews and following up on multiple tips received from the public, detectives developed probable cause to Wandick for murder.  On March 21, 2017, detectives obtained an arrest warrant for Wandick. 

Members of the Kern County Sheriff’s Office Gang Street Enforcement Unit and Gang Investigations Unit located Wandick in an apartment on Wainwright Dr. in Oildale.  Wandick was arrested without incident and booked in the Kern County Sheriff’s Office Central Receiving Facility for her no-bail warrant for murder.

The victim’s name and official cause of death will be released by the coroner’s office at a later time.  The Kern County Sheriff’s Office would like to thank the public for their assistance in this investigation. 

Without the cooperation of the public, this case might not have been solved as quickly as it was.  Anyone with any additional information in this case is asked to call the sheriff’s office at 661-861-3110 or Secret Witness at 661-322-4040.

Source:    http://www.turnto23.com

Skydive Suit Moves Toward Trial

BARNSTABLE — After waiting on the edge for years, the legal battle between skydive opponents and the town of Chatham just got a shove.

Last week, Barnstable Superior Court Judge Gary Nickerson set a Dec. 4 trial date for the suit filed against the town by the Citizens for a Safe Chatham Airport. Skydive opponents, who were arguing for a preliminary injunction to block the issuance of any skydiving contracts during the 2017 season, were pleased with the move.

Town officials are caught in the middle of a legal battle between skydive opponents and the Federal Aviation Administration, which has a pending administrative complaint against the town which would force airport officials to allow skydiving as part of general aviation activities. In a closed-door session this week, Chatham selectmen were expected to discuss strategy in the case, including whether they will continue to voluntarily refrain from accepting proposals from skydiving vendors until the suit is resolved in court. If they do so, this would be the fourth season since Skydive Cape Cod's contract was not renewed that there has been no skydiving at Chatham Airport.

The suit, filed by a group of residents who live near the airport, alleges that the homeowners suffered irreparable harm when skydiving was allowed at Chatham Airport in 2012 and 2013. Speaking for the plaintiffs, attorney Ira Zaleznik said his goal was to bring the suit to trial sometime before summer 2018, and his request for preliminary injunction aimed for “a delay of one more summer” in the town's issuance of a request for skydiving proposals. The suit will not seek monetary damages, just an injunction to block skydiving at the airport.

“It's not the kind of thing you could put a dollar value on,” Zaleznik said at last Thursday's hearing. “People will never get their summers back in 2012 and 2013.” But the harm is tangible, he argued. One neighbor was in the process of selling his home and skydive aircraft flew over the property three times as it was being shown to the prospective buyer.

“The buyers experienced that, and walked,” he said.

The plaintiffs allege that skydiving represents a nuisance under the state's Tort Claims Act, partly because of the noise from the airplanes and the skydivers, and partly because of the dangerous nature of skydiving. Zaleznik said dropping skydivers over an airport that has no control tower is “an accident waiting to happen.” He cited the emergency landing of a skydive aircraft in Lover's Lake in 2012 and an injury suffered by one skydiver who was hurt landing at the airport, along with the airport's tendency to have fog and birds in the area. “All of these dangers pose a severe threat to the neighbors,” Zaleznik argued.

Town Counsel Patrick Costello told the court that the case is legally complex and will be significant not only for Chatham “but for municipalities generally.” Since 2010, nuisance claims have been established under the Tort Claims Act, and arguing that noise from an airport represents a legal nuisance would open the possibility of claims at “virtually every municipal airport.” Costello said he grew up near Logan Airport, and it is reasonable to expect a certain amount of noise from any operation. “I'm sitting here in the courtroom and hearing airport noise,” he said.

Costello said the nuisance claim is faulty because the plaintiffs haven't suffered any peculiar inconvenience “that the public at large would not suffer.” Also, he argued, the suit seeks to block the town from issuing a new contract to a skydive vendor, and that particular action does not cause the plaintiffs special legal harm.

With regard to safety concerns, Costello argued that there were thousands of skydive flights from Chatham over two years, and only two major incidents. The emergency landing in the lake was a case of operator error unrelated to skydiving, he said, and the woman who was injured in a skydive landing alleged negligence on the part of the skydive vendor, not the town. The risk associated with skydiving is “inherent in any aviation” and in almost all recreational activities, he argued.

Though skydive opponents argue that Chatham is violating federal rules by allowing skydiving in a congested area, Costello rejected that claim. The arm of the federal government that would enforce those rules is the FAA, the very agency that has ordered the town to allow skydiving, he argued. “The FAA knows what's going on in Chatham,” he said.

A key part of the town's defense, though a fine point of law, is that the town had a choice when it came to accepting FAA funds for airport improvements. In doing so, it essentially entered into a contract, accepting money in exchange for a promise to allow general aviation activities. That action of entering into a contract is protected under the discretionary exemption for the Tort Claims Act, Costello said. The town would likewise be protected from nuisance claims for the action of signing a contract with a skydive vendor, he said.

Zaleznik refuted that idea, saying the town has no discretion to avoid following the law, based on plaintiffs' assertions that the town violated federal rules by allowing skydiving in a congested area. He argued that even if it was a skydive contractor that caused the noise and danger, the town is responsible because it was aware that the activity represents a nuisance.

Nickerson observed that, so far, the FAA has not taken any action against the town for not issuing a skydiving contract.

“They've ignored you for three years,” he said. By statute, the request for a preliminary injunction can be combined with a trial on the merits of the case, Nickerson said. “It seems to me the practical thing is to try the case and be done with it.”

Costello said he still hopes to file a motion for summary judgment first, in an effort to avoid the cost of a full trial. He said he would consult with town officials to finalize plans.

“I'm asking you to move it along,” Nickerson said. He set the trial date for Dec. 4.

Both attorneys said they will need time to prepare their cases, including time to depose a few witnesses, including at least one representative of the FAA.  

Original article can be found here: http://www.capecodchronicle.com

Incident occurred March 21, 2017 at Clarence E. Page Municipal Airport (KRCE), Oklahoma City, Oklahoma







Raw video: http://www.koco.com


Photo gallery:   http://kfor.com

OKLAHOMA CITY – No injuries were reported after an aircraft caught fire at a local airport Tuesday afternoon.

Initial reports indicate the cockpit of an aircraft caught fire at the Clarence E. Page Municipal Airport around 1:15 p.m.

The airport is located near I-40 and Cimarron Rd.

The plane was fully involved in flames, fire officials said.

It is still unclear how the fire started.

Piper PA-44-180T Turbo Seminole, Silver Express Co dba, N8376A: Incident occurred March 21, 2017 at Miami Executive Airport (KTMB), Miami-Dade County, Florida

Silver Express Co dba: http://registry.faa.gov/N8376A

Federal Aviation Administration / Flight Standards District Office; South Florida 

Airport departed and returned due to an engine problem and subsequently landed long on Runway 09L.

Date: 21-MAR-17
Time: 13:22:00Z
Regis#: N8376A
Aircraft Make: PIPER
Aircraft Model: PA-44
Event Type: INCIDENT
Highest Injury: NONE
Aircraft Missing: No
Damage: NONE
Activity: PERSONAL
Flight Phase: LANDING (LDG)
Operation: 91
City: MIAMI
State: FLORIDA

Beechcraft A36 Bonanza, KJK Enterprises LLC, N4271S: Incident occurred March 21, 2017 at Thibodaux Municipal Airport (L83), Lafourche Parish, Louisiana

KJK Enterprises LLC: http://registry.faa.gov/N4271S

Federal Aviation Administration / Flight Standards District Office; Baton Rouge, Louisiana 

Aircraft struck a deer while landing.

Date: 21-MAR-17
Time: 01:00:00Z
Regis#: N4271S
Aircraft Make: BEECH
Aircraft Model: B36
Event Type: INCIDENT
Highest Injury: NONE
Aircraft Missing: No
Damage: MINOR
Activity: PERSONAL
Flight Phase: LANDING (LDG)
Operation: 91
City: THIBODAUX
State: LOUISIANA

Beech 95-B55 (T42A) Baron, LS Express LLC, N62RF: Accident occurred March 21, 2017 at Long Island MacArthur Airport (KISP), Islip, Suffolk County, New York

The National Transportation Safety Board did not travel to the scene of this accident.  

Additional Participating Entities:
Federal Aviation Administration / Flight Standards District Office;  Farmingdale, New York


Aviation Accident Preliminary Report -  National Transportation Safety Board:  https://app.ntsb.gov/pdf

LS Express LLC:   http://registry.faa.gov/N62RF

NTSB Identification: ERA17LA134
14 CFR Part 91: General Aviation
Accident occurred Tuesday, March 21, 2017 in Islip, NY
Aircraft: BEECH 95B55, registration: N62RF
Injuries: 1 Uninjured.

This is preliminary information, subject to change, and may contain errors. Any errors in this report will be corrected when the final report has been completed. NTSB investigators may not have traveled in support of this investigation and used data provided by various sources to prepare this aircraft accident report.

On March 21, 2017, about 2056 eastern daylight time, Beech 95-B55, N62RF, was substantially damaged during landing at Long Island MacArthur Airport (ISP), Islip, New York. The private pilot was not injured. Night visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed for the local personal flight, conducted under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91.

According to the pilot, on the night of the accident he intended to perform three full-stop landings at ISP to maintain currency. To allow time for his night vision to adjust and be sure the airplane was properly configured, he contacted air traffic control for clearance to depart the traffic pattern and fly direct to the Calverton VOR/DME (CCC). He then departed ISP, flew the published hold at CCC, and was subsequently vectored to the final approach course for runway 24 at ISP. He also loaded the ILS Runway 24 approach into his Garmin GPS to aid in situational awareness.

Once on final approach for landing, he used his "written checklist" and performed his "GUMPF's" check several times. Everything seemed "normal;" however, when the airplane touched down, it felt like the airplane touched down normally then dropped. The airplane then skidded to a stop. He shut the fuel and all the electrical power off, exited the airplane and waited for airport fire and rescue personnel to arrive.

Examination of the airplane revealed that the bottom of the fuselage displayed extensive areas of ground down, scraped, and torn sheet metal. The forward spar carry through, the left side keel beam, the pitot tube, and left engine exhaust tips were damaged. In addition, both engine propeller blades were curled and damaged. The nose, left and right main landing gear doors, and the left and right wing flaps were also damaged.

According to Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and pilot records, the pilot held a private pilot certificate with ratings for airplane single-engine land, airplane multi-engine land, and instrument airplane. His most recent application for a FAA third-class medical certificate was dated April 18, 2016. The pilot reported that he had accrued approximately 868 total hours of flight experience.

According to FAA and maintenance records, the airplane was manufactured in 1976. The airplane's most recent annual inspection was completed on November 9, 2016. At the time of the inspection, the airplane had accrued 4521.7 total hours of operation.


de Havilland Canada DHC-3T Vazar Turbine Otter, Promech Air, N270PA: Fatal accident occurred June 25, 2015 in Ketchikan, Alaska

A floatplane pilot for a Ketchikan-based air tour operator and the company's safety "culture" were directly responsible for the 2015 crash that killed the pilot and eight cruise-ship passengers on a shore excursion, the National Transportation Safety Board found Tuesday.

Meeting in Washington, D.C., the board's four current members unanimously found that the cause of the crash was Promech Air pilot Bryan Krill's "decision to continue visual flight into an area of instrument meteorological conditions that resulted in geographic disorientation and controlled flight into terrain."

The de Havilland Otter slammed into a mountainside near Ella Lake, roughly 20 miles northeast of Ketchikan, on its return from Misty Fjords National Monument on June 25, 2015. It was carrying a group of passengers from the Holland America Line's MS Westerdam.

The board also blamed the crash on a Promech company "culture" that "tacitly endorsed flying in hazardous weather and failed to manage the risk associated with the competitive pressures affecting Ketchikan-area air tour operators." The company's lack of a formal safety program and its inadequate operational control of releasing flights for departure were also cited.

After about two hours of discussion during Tuesday's meeting, NTSB staff proposed citing Promech's approach to safety – in which some pilots reported being pressured to fly despite poor weather – as a contributing factor to the crash. Robert Sumwalt, the board's acting chair, asked that those issues be upgraded to a causal factor of the crash, which the board unanimously approved.

"Promech and at least one other operator that was willing to take more weather-related risks were both able to fly more revenue passengers than two other more conservative operators who cancelled flights that day," the NTSB said in a statement on the findings Tuesday.

Promech's Alaska operations were purchased in 2016 by Taquan Air, a competing carrier in Ketchikan. Taquan officials said they were still considering the board's findings Tuesday and didn't have immediate comment.

Board members also discussed competitive and time pressures among air tour operators in Ketchikan, including the fact that Promech's flights were running too late on the day of the crash to return by the 12:30 p.m. "all-aboard" time for Westerdam passengers to leave Ketchikan. Missing the deadline meant Promech would have to transport the passengers to their ship's next port of call at its own expense.

"Lives depended on the pilot's decision making," Sumwalt said in the NTSB statement. "Pilot decisions are informed, for better or worse, by their company's culture. This company allowed competitive pressure to overwhelm the common-sense needs of passenger safety in its operations. That's the climate in which the accident pilot worked."

https://www.adn.com

The wreckage of a flightseeing plane operated by Promech Air that crashed near Ketchikan on June 25, 2015. (NTSB)


New details were revealed Tuesday about the events leading up to a 2015 plane crash near Ketchikan that killed nine people, eight of them cruise-ship tourists, when their flightseeing plane slammed into a mountainside.

The details included the opinions of colleagues that the pilot was responsible and skilled.

The National Transportation Safety Board released a factual docket Tuesday with dozens of investigative documents tied to the de Havilland Otter crash on June 25, 2015, in Misty Fjords National Monument.

Everyone on board the Promech Air flight was killed: pilot Bryan Krill, 64, and eight passengers from the Holland America Line's MS Westerdam on a shore excursion.

A preliminary NTSB report released shortly after the crash indicated the plane was returning from a flightseeing trip, flying in "marginal" weather conditions under visual flight rules when it crashed into a rock face near Ella Lake, about 20 miles northeast of Ketchikan around 12:15 p.m.

Clint Johnson, NTSB's Alaska chief, said Tuesday the difficulty of even reaching the wrecked plane, located on a steep mountainside, was a hindrance to examining the site.

"This was one of the most challenging sites we've been to in five years," Johnson said.

Johnson characterized the crash as a CFIT, or "controlled flight into terrain."

Promech's Alaska operations were bought out by Ketchikan-based Taquan Air in 2016. A message left Tuesday with Taquan wasn't returned.

The docket contains reports analyzing everything from the aircraft's flight data to images captured on tourists' smartphones and interviews with cruise line and Promech employees.

According to the NTSB records, several Promech pilots and staff considered Krill — a pilot with 1,200 hours of Alaska flight time — a mentor figure with exemplary piloting skills, someone who would often decide not to fly due to weather conditions.

The company's president and CEO at the time, Marcus Sessoms, told NTSB Krill once visited his office to apologize for aborting a tour and landing in Ketchikan due to rain other pilots were flying through.

"(Krill) said 'Boss, I'm sorry. It was raining and I didn't feel comfortable,'" investigators wrote. "Mr. Sessoms told him, 'You never have to say sorry to me for coming back. When you come back I will pat you on the back every time.'"

But some other pilots at Promech had a different view of Krill's piloting habits. One of them told investigators in one incident near Ella Lake, Krill had ignored warnings of downdrafts and his plane's floats struck trees when he flew through the area.

NTSB later learned Krill had flown two tour flights on the day of the incident.

"An entry in the pilot's logbook from that day, June 14, 2015, read, 'Misty Trip, Thought I was dead,'" investigators wrote. "Investigators contacted some of the passengers who had been on those flights. They did not recall anything out of the ordinary about the flights except that they had been turbulent."

Just 11 days later, the day of the crash, NTSB investigators said Krill safely flew two tour groups from Ketchikan harbor to Rudyerd Bay in Misty Fjords and back. A cruise ship shore excursion manager told investigators Taquan Air, which also offered flightseeing packages for cruise passengers, had cancelled all of its tours early that morning due to weather.

On his third trip of the day, Krill was the third of four Promech planes making the flight. The planes took a southern "long route" to Rudyerd Bay, about five minutes slower but considered safer in poor weather by pilots because more of it was over water, than the largely overland "short route" through Ella Narrows and over Ella Lake.

After a pilot from another company radioed that weather over Ella Lake was "wide open," three of the four Promech pilots, including Krill, opted to return by the "short route."

Two of those planes flew safely through the area. Krill's Otter never made it back.

Sessoms told NTSB Krill was expected back in Ketchikan at 12:40 p.m., because the cruise passengers needed to return for the ship's departure.

When Krill didn't answer his radio, Sessoms took off in another Otter to look for the plane; he was in the air when Promech staff reported hearing a signal for Krill's emergency locator transmitter.

Responders located the crash site at about 3 p.m., and confirmed there were no survivors.

The crashed Otter carried a terrain avoidance warning system, intended to provide visual and audio alerts of oncoming hills or mountains.

Promech pilots told the NTSB the system could be manually disengaged by means of an "inhibit" switch, which was often done in some areas — including near Rudyerd Bay — where it would sound too frequently. The system in Krill's plane was found disengaged at the crash site.

Additionally, an NTSB examination of Promech's safety training found the company's general operating manual called for flights to be approved "in joint agreement and coordination between the pilot and flight scheduler."

The Promech flight scheduler who handled Krill's flight that day later said the company had no formal training program for her position. Her own training "consisted of studying the company general operations manual and operations specifications, and on-the-job training."

"Asked whether she could recall having any conversations with (Krill) about the weather that morning, she said she only recalled the weather report when he was outbound on the first round of flights," investigators wrote. "That was all she could remember coming from him."

The NTSB noted Promech had been working with the Medallion Foundation, a nonprofit accident-avoidance group formed by the Alaska Air Carriers Association. The organization allows carriers to earn "stars" for elements of its operations, including work to avoid controlled-flight-into-terrain crashes and overall safety.

Promech officials told the NTSB that the company had earned a star for CFIT avoidance. Investigators noted Promech's CFIT avoidance procedures, developed jointly with the foundation, were not a part of the company's general operating manual or its training program, both of which had been approved by the FAA.

Investigators also tried to request details on Medallion's audits of Promech.

"Multiple requests by the NTSB to both Promech and Medallion Foundation for additional information regarding Promech's external and internal Medallion audits were denied," investigators wrote.

Staff at the Medallion Foundation said the organization's executive director, Jerry Rock, was traveling and unavailable for comment Tuesday.

"There should be no conclusions that should be drawn from this information — this is a data dump," Johnson said. A final report on the crash's probable cause will probably be released the last week of April.

Keith Holloway, an NTSB spokesman, said the determination of cause may occur during a formal meeting of the five-member board, which is currently short by one member pending an appointment by President Donald Trump, during a hearing in Washington, D.C. The date for that meeting has not been set.

Read more here:  https://www.adn.com

The National Transportation Safety Board traveled to the scene of this accident.

Docket And Docket Items - National Transportation Safety Board: https://dms.ntsb.gov/pubdms

Aviation Accident Preliminary Report - National Transportation Safety Board:  https://app.ntsb.gov/pdf

NTSB Identification: ANC15MA041
Nonscheduled 14 CFR Part 135: Air Taxi & Commuter
Accident occurred Thursday, June 25, 2015 in Ketchikan, AK
Aircraft: DEHAVILLAND DHC 3, registration: N270PA
Injuries: 9 Fatal.

This is preliminary information, subject to change, and may contain errors. Any errors in this report will be corrected when the final report has been completed. NTSB investigators traveled in support of this investigation and used data obtained from various sources to prepare this aircraft accident report.


On June 25, 2015, about 1215 Alaska daylight time, a single-engine, turbine-powered, float-equipped de Havilland DHC-3 (Otter) airplane, N270PA, sustained substantial damage when it impacted mountainous tree-covered terrain, about 24 miles northeast of Ketchikan, Alaska. The airplane was being operated under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 135, as an on-demand visual flight rules (VFR) sightseeing flight when the accident occurred. The airplane was owned by Pantechnicon Aviation, of Minden, Nevada, and operated by Promech Air, Inc., of Ketchikan. The commercial pilot and eight passengers were fatally injured. Marginal visual meteorological conditions were reported in the area at the time of the accident. The flight departed a floating dock located in Rudyerd Bay about 44 miles northeast of Ketchikan about 1200 for a tour through Misty Fjords National Monument Wilderness. A company VFR flight plan was in effect. At the time of the accident, the flight was returning to the operator's base at the Ketchikan Harbor Seaplane Base, Ketchikan. 


The flight was a sightseeing flight for passengers of a cruise ship that was docked in Ketchikan. The tour, named Cruise/Fly, consisted of two groups of passengers. One group departed Ketchikan onboard a marine vessel and the other group departed via airplane, with a predetermined rendezvous at the floating dock in Rudyerd Bay. Once at the floating dock, the two groups would switch transportation modes for the return trip to Ketchikan. 


The operator reported that the accident airplane departed Rudyerd Bay as the third of four float-equipped airplanes on air tour flights over the Misty Fjords National Monument Wilderness. The airplanes departed about 5 minutes apart, and the standard route of flight was southwest, over an area of remote inland fjords, coastal waterways, and mountainous tree-covered terrain. 


When the airplane failed to return to Ketchikan, the operator initiated a search for the missing airplane and heard an emergency locator transmitter (ELT) signal along the accident pilot's anticipated route of flight. A helicopter from Temsco Helicopters, Inc., of Ketchikan, was dispatched to the suspected accident site to search for the missing airplane. However, the helicopter pilot said that he was unable to search the upper levels of the mountainous areas due to low ceilings and poor visibility. The helicopter pilot said that, after waiting for the weather conditions to improve, he was able to search the upper elevations of the search area and located the wreckage about 1429. The Ketchikan Volunteer Rescue Squad (KVRS) team members reached the accident site and confirmed that the airplane's occupants had sustained fatal injuries. 


The NTSB investigator-in-charge along with another NTSB investigator, with help from KVRS, reached the accident site on the morning of June 27. The airplane impacted trees and a near vertical rock face in a nose high, wings level attitude at an elevation of about 1,600 feet mean sea level and came to rest upright on top of its separated floats, in an area of heavily forested, steep terrain. 


The accident airplane was equipped with an avionics package known as automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast (ADS-B), which is also known as "Capstone." ADS-B technology provides pilots with situational awareness by displaying the airplane's position over terrain, while using GPS technology, coupled with an instrument panel mounted, moving map display. The ADS-B equipment installed in the accident airplane included two Chelton multifunction display (MFD) units. One MFD provides the pilot with a moving map with terrain awareness information, and the other provides primary flight display information. The two MFD units were removed from the wreckage and shipped, to the NTSB vehicle recorder laboratory, Washington, D.C. 


The accident airplane was equipped with a Pratt & Whitney PT6A-135A engine that produces 750 shaft horsepower. 


A comprehensive NTSB postaccident examination of the engine and airframe is pending, after the airplane wreckage is recovered to Ketchikan. 


The closest weather reporting facility is Ketchikan Airport (KTN), Ketchikan, AK, about 24 miles southwest of the accident site. At 1153, an aviation routine weather report (METAR) at KTN reported in part: wind 130 degrees at 15 knots, gust 23 knots; visibility 6 statute miles, rain and mist, runway 11 visual range 4,000 variable to greater than 6,000 feet; few clouds 800 feet, broken clouds 1,200 feet, overcast clouds 2,700 feet; 61 degrees F; dew point 57 degrees F; altimeter 29.91 in Hg.


PANTECHNICON AVIATION LTD: http://registry.faa.gov/N270PA

FAA Flight Standards District Office:  FAA Juneau FSDO-05


The National Transportation Safety Board says it’s not their problem. The Alaska State Troopers says it’s out of their hands. And while the Ketchikan Volunteer Rescue Squad secured the plane to the mountainside, they’re saying it’s no longer up to them.

The DeHavilland DHC-3 that crashed near Misty Fjords National Monument, killing nine, still clings to the side of a rather rocky p lace.

Chris John is with the Ketchikan Volunteer Rescue Squad. He says the squad’s job was to try and rescue anyone who may have survived and make sure the area was safe for NTSB investigators.

“As far as this accident, we are probably done with our involvement. We do sometimes go back out when parts of the wreck are recovered. Our role is usually to make sure it’s a safe situation… it’s pretty rugged up there.”

The investigation is ongoing, but the NTSB says it has nothing to do with plane removal.

So how is this remedied? Just left large piece of twisted metal stuck on a mountainside?

As it turns out, Temsco Helicopters, which originally found the crash site and helped with the rescue mission, has volunteered to help fly the wreck out. Except there’s one problem: the only helicopter big enough to retrieve the aircraft is up north, fighting fires.

This leaves some of the volunteer rescue squad’s ropes and straps, securing the plane, up on the mountain with the mound of metal.  Eric Lunde, another Ketchikan Rescue Squad volunteer, says the weathered equipment will have to be replaced. Lunde says either the Troopers will help refund the  lost items, they will have to ask for grants or, most likely,  KVRS  will have to ask for donations to make sure they’re ready for future missions.

“The state troopers, the state will reimburse us, although the state’s budget isn’t looking very good. In the past, that’s how that’s worked. But a lot of the stuff, we seek grants where we can. Lots of personal donations. Lots of just our membership donates money, sometimes enough. Sometimes we need something; sometimes some of our members will just go buy it.”

While Temsco officials say they still plan on extracting the plane, they won’t guarantee anything until the large helicopter returns from the blazes up North.

Source:  http://www.krbd.org












Bryan Krill, the pilot of the sightseeing floatplane that crashed Thursday in Misty Fjords National Monument, is seen here in a February 2015 photo.
 Courtesy John Krill
~



ANCHORAGE, ALASKA — A sightseeing floatplane that crashed in a mountainous area in southeast Alaska, killing all nine people on board, was equipped with technology to provide detailed information about the terrain, according to a federal accident report released Tuesday.

The preliminary report by the National Transportation Safety Board also said the June 25 crash occurred in conditions of reduced visibility. However, it drew no conclusions about the cause of the crash.

The deHavilland DHC-3 Otter turboprop crashed on a steep cliff about 25 miles from Ketchikan, killing the pilot and eight cruise ship passengers. The excursion was sold through the cruise company Holland America and operated by Ketchikan-based Promech Air.

NTSB has recovered two instrument displays in the wreckage that are part of a terrain-avoidance technology known as the Capstone program, according to Clint Johnson, head of the NTSB Alaska office.

The damaged displays were sent to a Washington, D.C., lab, where information will be downloaded.

Pilot Bryan Krill, 64, of Hope, Idaho, was flying under visual flight rules, a set of regulations used when the weather is more or less clear enough for a pilot to see where the aircraft is going.

The rest of the plane remains at the crash site, 800 feet above Ella Lake. The extreme steepness of the location has slowed recovery of the wreckage, Johnson said.

Promech declined to discuss the NTSB report, saying the agency "specifically asked Promech not to comment on any of their briefings or reports," according to Thompson & Co. Public Relations, which is representing Promech.

The Capstone program generally provides GPS technology that allows pilots to see on cockpit displays concise information about terrain, other aircraft in the area and weather. The equipment is not designed as a blind guide in such conditions as flying through clouds but is used as backup to what the human eye can see.

"The most important thing here is, it gives the flight crew the ability of situational awareness — where the airplane is in relative proximity to rising terrain or whatever," Johnson said. "It's not a save-all. It's a tool that's used in terrain avoidance."

Johnson said he doesn't know how complete the technology was on the plane that crashed.

The crash occurred as the plane was on its way back from Misty Fjords National Monument, a wilderness area of glacial valleys, lakes and snowcapped peaks. Johnson said other pilots were reporting marginal visual flight conditions in the crash area.

A meteorologist working on the case will be looking at the weather at the time of the crash. But Johnson said it's far too early to say if weather was a factor.

"At this point right now, the jury's still out on that," Johnson said.

Read more here: http://www.macon.com


A brother of the pilot killed in Thursday’s plane crash near Ketchikan said Saturday that the pilot had been flying for decades and was “very conservative.”

“He’s a cautious pilot -- always has been because he flies in the mountains,” John Krill, 70, said in a phone interview from California. “So the whole thing’s a mystery to me, what happened.”

Krill’s youngest brother, Bryan Krill, 64, was flying a float-equipped de Havilland DHC-3 Otter on Thursday when it crashed into a rock face in Misty Fjords National Monument. Bryan Krill, who was from Hope, Idaho, and the eight passengers on board were killed.

Alaska State Troopers identified Krill and the eight other passengers late Friday: Rowland Cheney, 71, and Mary Doucette, 59, both of Lodi, California; Glenda Cambiaso, 31, and Hugo Cambiaso, 65, both of North Potomac, Maryland; June Kranenburg, 73, and Leonard Kranenburg, 63, both of Medford, Oregon; Margie Apodaca, 63, and Raymond Apodaca, 70, both of Sparks, Nevada.

John Krill said his brother was married and had two daughters.

He began flying in the 1970s and flew commercially for a company in Idaho and for Promech Air, the Ketchikan-based company that operated Thursday’s flight, John Krill said.

“He really loved flying -- he made every effort to learn the skills and do it,” he said.

Promech, in a prepared statement Saturday morning, said Bryan Krill started working with the company earlier this year as a summer pilot.

He had 4,300 hours of flight experience, including roughly 1,700 hours piloting single engine seaplanes, the statement said.

"Flying in Alaska was a passion of Bryan’s -- he loved his job and loved what he did,” the statement quoted Marcus Sessoms, president of Promech, as saying. “His loss will be profoundly felt in the aviation community and by anyone who knew him.”

John Krill said he reacted with “disbelief” after hearing news of his brother’s involvement in the crash, “because I know he’s not that kind of pilot to screw around.”

“I’d just emphasize that he’s not a hot dog,” he added.

John Krill never flew with his brother, but he said his characterization was based on the experience of a third brother, David, and of Bryan Krill’s two daughters.

All had flown with Bryan Krill and said he was careful, John Krill said.

He added that Bryan Krill had also been a businessman. At various points, he owned a franchise of Mexican restaurants in Arizona and southern Nevada, as well as an equipment rental company in Southern California, his brother said.

Bryan Krill had lived in Idaho for “a long time,” John Krill said. He added that he wasn’t clear about the details of his brother’s flying career in Alaska.

John Krill said Bryan Krill was “in good shape” at age 64.

“I just saw him in February -- he was looking good then,” John Krill said.

Story, comments and photo: http://www.adn.com



The company that owned and operated the airplane that crashed into a cliff in Alaska killing nine people also owns Key West Seaplane Adventures.

Promech Air is a charter plane company based in Ketchikan, Alaska that offers sightseeing tours of Southeastern Alaska, while its sister company in Key West offers tours to the Dry Tortugas and Fort Jefferson. 

Key West Seaplane Adventures general manager Peter Green said he has not had much contact with the Alaskan company since the accident.

“It’s a horrible experience to go through all around,” he said. “We’re giving them the space to do what they need to do.”

A flight carrying a pilot and eight passengers crashed into a cliff 800 feet above Ella Lake on Thursday afternoon, killing all nine aboard. Emergency crews were still attempting to recover the bodies as of Friday afternoon and the cause of the crash is still unknown. The names of the deceased will not be released until all families have been notified.

“There is nothing I can say that can alleviate the pain and overwhelming sense of loss,” said Promech Air president Marcus Sessoms in a statement. “At this moment, we all share the pain and anguish of this terrible event.”

 While the name of the pilot has not been released, Green confirmed that the pilot was never an employee of the Key West site. The plane, a Havilland DHC-3 Otter, is the same aircraft used by Key West Seaplane Adventures. The company has a fleet of six planes similar to the one that crashed, two in Key West and four in Alaska. 

Weather conditions in the area of the crash were poor enough that search operations could not be initiated until Friday. Green said there are a variety of environmental factors taken into account before deciding whether or not to take to the sky.

“We look at so many parameters: history, experiences, local factors,” he said. “There’s no wind threshold because there are different types of wind here. We just have a lot of different parameters to look at.”

Key West Seaplane Adventures will continue operating as usual but changes may be made depending on the outcome of the Alaskan investigation. 

Source:  http://keysnews.com

NTSB's Misty Fjords crash investigation will be long and complex

Last week, the National Transportation Safety Board released a preliminary report on the recent crash of a sightseeing flight in Misty Fjords National Monument near Ketchikan that killed the pilot and eight passengers.

But that report is only the beginning of an extensive investigation. It will likely be a year before a probable cause for the accident is determined, and during that period the NTSB will conduct a staggering amount of research into the circumstances surrounding the crash. This is familiar territory for the agency and also, sadly, all too familiar for Alaskans as well.

Examining the physical evidence

Pilot Brian Krill was flying a single-engine turbine de Havilland Otter aircraft for the air taxi service Promech Air.

Once the Otter's wreckage is transported to Ketchikan by the aircraft insurance company, it will be received by the NTSB.

“The engine will immediately be placed in a sealed can and then shipped to the manufacturer," Clint Johnson, NTSB Alaska Region director said. The turbine engine from this Otter was made by Pratt and Whitney and will likely be shipped to the company's Montreal facility for a detailed post-accident examination. "While transported it will be escorted and later opened under NTSB supervision,” Johnson said. 

According to Johnson, the fuselage will remain in Ketchikan where it will be examined by an NTSB structural engineer and representatives of the Viking Air Limited Corporation which now owns the type certificate for the de Havilland DHC-3 Otter airplane. 

Decision-making pressures

The eight passengers onboard the aircraft were all passengers on the Holland America Westerdam, which sold tickets for the "Cruise/Fly" shore excursion flight to Rudyerd Bay through a previous arrangement with Promech.

As part of its investigation, the NTSB will be speaking with Holland America employees to determine the nature of the interaction between the companies and their personnel, including how directly they engaged with Krill on the day of the accident and whether any pressure might have existed within that relationship.

An unusual aspect of Alaska aviation is the degree of contact commercial pilots have with their customers, whether those customers are employees of the U.S. Postal Service, representatives of a company engaged in charter contracts, or ticketed passengers.

In reports published on Alaskan air safety in 1980 and 1995, the NSTB has documented how pressure from these customers can have a profoundly negative impact on pilot decision-making. 

“It is important for pilots, whether they fly for a company or themselves, to always practice good decision making. Establish a set of risk assessment procedures and stick with them; know the minimums under which you will operate and not violate those based on circumstance,” says Harry Kieling, Chairman of the Alaskan Aviation Safety Foundation.

The circumstances he refers to includes all manner of pressures, from degrading weather to a desire to get home to the demands of people in the seats.

One very effective way to keep outside pressure from influencing pilot decision-making is through cue-based training -- something recommended by the NTSB for Southeast Alaska air tour operators in 2007 following the crash that year of a Taquan Air flight that killed all five people aboard. This training involves establishing checkpoints along regularly flown routes. If, at any time during the course of a flight along on that route, a checkpoint is not visible, then the pilot must turn around. The decision to continue on -- to “go take a look” -- is thus taken out of the pilot’s hands. 

A 2012 letter from the FAA to the NTSB said that by 2011, all the region's air tour operators had “added materials and concepts developed as part of the cue-based training project to their training programs.” It's unclear, though, if that training expanded beyond videos and ground school discussion to include flight training and published route checkpoints.

Whether or not a company uses cue-based training, there's always a need for established contingency plans if a flight cannot depart or continue.

“You always need to have the option of spending the night if you can’t fly back because of weather or other safety concerns,” Kieling says. 

Denali operators, for example, have gear and supply caches on the glaciers for that reason; in 2013, a Talkeetna Air Taxi flight was forced to remain on Ruth Glacier after the weather closed in during a tour.

It wasn't immediately clear whether Southeast tour operators maintain similar contingency plans. Investigators will try to determine, for example, whether the boat involved in the excursion the day of Misty Fjords crash was capable of ferrying all of the passengers back to the ship from the floating dock in Rudyerd Bay if the aircraft could not fly, and whose decision it would've been to cancel, if necessary, the flying portion of the trip and revert to a contingency plan.

The NTSB won't know, until it completes its long investigation, whether any such pressure may have been exerted on the pilot. And with everything from weather to pilot turnover at Promech to be examined, outside influence is just one element of many to be considered. 

Flying into marginal weather

Krill's flying experience will be thoroughly analyzed, including his number of instrument hours flown and instrument currency. His proficiency at flying solely by instruments would affect his ability to react under inadvertent flight into the marginal weather conditions that were noted by the NTSB.

As ADN has noted in the past however, there's a sharp difference between flying under instrument flight rules and attempting to use onboard equipment, such as a GPS, to navigate visually when conditions suddenly diminish.

Tour flights, by their nature, are nearly always operated under visual flight rules and in this case, the pilot's ability to suddenly and successfully transfer to instrument flight would have been influenced by factors including his training, ability, specific knowledge of the aircraft and the altitude at which he was flying.

The fact that, according to the NTSB, the aircraft impacted "a near vertical rock face in a nose high, wings level attitude" suggests Krill was trying to climb. 

It's not known whether he could see the terrain around him, but moving map technology would have just served as a guide; it's not intended to replace the situational awareness that is lost when visibility decreases and can never be considered a substitute for instrument flight standards and requirements.

A cascade of factors

Aircraft accidents rarely happen for a single reason. 

Usually they are the result of a cascade of factors -- factors that can date back months or longer and combine to create the unique set of circumstances resulting in a crash. The skills and knowledge a pilot did or did not learn, the practices a company did or did not encourage, the customer relationships which did or did not influence decision-making and the regulatory compliance the FAA did or did not enforce can contribute to what occurred on a fateful flight.

That means aircraft accident investigations are complex and the NTSB will have much to look at as it tries to uncover what went wrong at Misty Fjords.

But for Harry Kieling, the air safety advocate, one thing is very clear.

“Every pilot should establish personal weather minimums that are at least equal to those of the Federal Aviation Regulations or even greater,” he asserts. “And don’t ever let anyone talk you out of them; including yourself.”

Source:  https://www.adn.com
Bryan Krill, the pilot of the sightseeing floatplane that crashed in Misty Fjords National Monument, is seen here in a February 2015 photo.


The wreckage of a flightseeing plane operated by Promech Air that crashed near Ketchikan on June 25, 2015. (NTSB)



New details were revealed Tuesday about the events leading up to a 2015 plane crash near Ketchikan that killed nine people, eight of them cruise-ship tourists, when their flightseeing plane slammed into a mountainside.

The details included the opinions of colleagues that the pilot was responsible and skilled.

The National Transportation Safety Board released a factual docket Tuesday with dozens of investigative documents tied to the de Havilland Otter crash on June 25, 2015, in Misty Fjords National Monument.

Everyone on board the Promech Air flight was killed: pilot Bryan Krill, 64, and eight passengers from the Holland America Line's MS Westerdam on a shore excursion.

A preliminary NTSB report released shortly after the crash indicated the plane was returning from a flightseeing trip, flying in "marginal" weather conditions under visual flight rules when it crashed into a rock face near Ella Lake, about 20 miles northeast of Ketchikan around 12:15 p.m.

Clint Johnson, NTSB's Alaska chief, said Tuesday the difficulty of even reaching the wrecked plane, located on a steep mountainside, was a hindrance to examining the site.

"This was one of the most challenging sites we've been to in five years," Johnson said.

Johnson characterized the crash as a CFIT, or "controlled flight into terrain."

Promech's Alaska operations were bought out by Ketchikan-based Taquan Air in 2016. A message left Tuesday with Taquan wasn't returned.

The docket contains reports analyzing everything from the aircraft's flight data to images captured on tourists' smartphones and interviews with cruise line and Promech employees.

According to the NTSB records, several Promech pilots and staff considered Krill — a pilot with 1,200 hours of Alaska flight time — a mentor figure with exemplary piloting skills, someone who would often decide not to fly due to weather conditions.

The company's president and CEO at the time, Marcus Sessoms, told NTSB Krill once visited his office to apologize for aborting a tour and landing in Ketchikan due to rain other pilots were flying through.

"(Krill) said 'Boss, I'm sorry. It was raining and I didn't feel comfortable,'" investigators wrote. "Mr. Sessoms told him, 'You never have to say sorry to me for coming back. When you come back I will pat you on the back every time.'"

But some other pilots at Promech had a different view of Krill's piloting habits. One of them told investigators in one incident near Ella Lake, Krill had ignored warnings of downdrafts and his plane's floats struck trees when he flew through the area.

NTSB later learned Krill had flown two tour flights on the day of the incident.

"An entry in the pilot's logbook from that day, June 14, 2015, read, 'Misty Trip, Thought I was dead,'" investigators wrote. "Investigators contacted some of the passengers who had been on those flights. They did not recall anything out of the ordinary about the flights except that they had been turbulent."

Just 11 days later, the day of the crash, NTSB investigators said Krill safely flew two tour groups from Ketchikan harbor to Rudyerd Bay in Misty Fjords and back. A cruise ship shore excursion manager told investigators Taquan Air, which also offered flightseeing packages for cruise passengers, had cancelled all of its tours early that morning due to weather.

On his third trip of the day, Krill was the third of four Promech planes making the flight. The planes took a southern "long route" to Rudyerd Bay, about five minutes slower but considered safer in poor weather by pilots because more of it was over water, than the largely overland "short route" through Ella Narrows and over Ella Lake.

After a pilot from another company radioed that weather over Ella Lake was "wide open," three of the four Promech pilots, including Krill, opted to return by the "short route."

Two of those planes flew safely through the area. Krill's Otter never made it back.

Sessoms told NTSB Krill was expected back in Ketchikan at 12:40 p.m., because the cruise passengers needed to return for the ship's departure.

When Krill didn't answer his radio, Sessoms took off in another Otter to look for the plane; he was in the air when Promech staff reported hearing a signal for Krill's emergency locator transmitter.

Responders located the crash site at about 3 p.m., and confirmed there were no survivors.

The crashed Otter carried a terrain avoidance warning system, intended to provide visual and audio alerts of oncoming hills or mountains.

Promech pilots told the NTSB the system could be manually disengaged by means of an "inhibit" switch, which was often done in some areas — including near Rudyerd Bay — where it would sound too frequently. The system in Krill's plane was found disengaged at the crash site.

Additionally, an NTSB examination of Promech's safety training found the company's general operating manual called for flights to be approved "in joint agreement and coordination between the pilot and flight scheduler."

The Promech flight scheduler who handled Krill's flight that day later said the company had no formal training program for her position. Her own training "consisted of studying the company general operations manual and operations specifications, and on-the-job training."

"Asked whether she could recall having any conversations with (Krill) about the weather that morning, she said she only recalled the weather report when he was outbound on the first round of flights," investigators wrote. "That was all she could remember coming from him."

The NTSB noted Promech had been working with the Medallion Foundation, a nonprofit accident-avoidance group formed by the Alaska Air Carriers Association. The organization allows carriers to earn "stars" for elements of its operations, including work to avoid controlled-flight-into-terrain crashes and overall safety.

Promech officials told the NTSB that the company had earned a star for CFIT avoidance. Investigators noted Promech's CFIT avoidance procedures, developed jointly with the foundation, were not a part of the company's general operating manual or its training program, both of which had been approved by the FAA.

Investigators also tried to request details on Medallion's audits of Promech.

"Multiple requests by the NTSB to both Promech and Medallion Foundation for additional information regarding Promech's external and internal Medallion audits were denied," investigators wrote.

Staff at the Medallion Foundation said the organization's executive director, Jerry Rock, was traveling and unavailable for comment Tuesday.

"There should be no conclusions that should be drawn from this information — this is a data dump," Johnson said. A final report on the crash's probable cause will probably be released the last week of April.

Keith Holloway, an NTSB spokesman, said the determination of cause may occur during a formal meeting of the five-member board, which is currently short by one member pending an appointment by President Donald Trump, during a hearing in Washington, D.C. The date for that meeting has not been set.

Read more here:  https://www.adn.com

The National Transportation Safety Board traveled to the scene of this accident.

Docket And Docket Items - National Transportation Safety Board: https://dms.ntsb.gov/pubdms

Aviation Accident Preliminary Report - National Transportation Safety Board:  https://app.ntsb.gov/pdf

PANTECHNICON AVIATION LTD: http://registry.faa.gov/N270PA

FAA Flight Standards District Office:  FAA Juneau FSDO-05




NTSB Identification: ANC15MA041
Nonscheduled 14 CFR Part 135: Air Taxi & Commuter
Accident occurred Thursday, June 25, 2015 in Ketchikan, AK
Aircraft: DEHAVILLAND DHC 3, registration: N270PA
Injuries: 9 Fatal.

This is preliminary information, subject to change, and may contain errors. Any errors in this report will be corrected when the final report has been completed. NTSB investigators traveled in support of this investigation and used data obtained from various sources to prepare this aircraft accident report.


On June 25, 2015, about 1215 Alaska daylight time, a single-engine, turbine-powered, float-equipped de Havilland DHC-3 (Otter) airplane, N270PA, sustained substantial damage when it impacted mountainous tree-covered terrain, about 24 miles northeast of Ketchikan, Alaska. The airplane was being operated under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 135, as an on-demand visual flight rules (VFR) sightseeing flight when the accident occurred. The airplane was owned by Pantechnicon Aviation, of Minden, Nevada, and operated by Promech Air, Inc., of Ketchikan. The commercial pilot and eight passengers were fatally injured. Marginal visual meteorological conditions were reported in the area at the time of the accident. The flight departed a floating dock located in Rudyerd Bay about 44 miles northeast of Ketchikan about 1200 for a tour through Misty Fjords National Monument Wilderness. A company VFR flight plan was in effect. At the time of the accident, the flight was returning to the operator's base at the Ketchikan Harbor Seaplane Base, Ketchikan. 


The flight was a sightseeing flight for passengers of a cruise ship that was docked in Ketchikan. The tour, named Cruise/Fly, consisted of two groups of passengers. One group departed Ketchikan onboard a marine vessel and the other group departed via airplane, with a predetermined rendezvous at the floating dock in Rudyerd Bay. Once at the floating dock, the two groups would switch transportation modes for the return trip to Ketchikan. 


The operator reported that the accident airplane departed Rudyerd Bay as the third of four float-equipped airplanes on air tour flights over the Misty Fjords National Monument Wilderness. The airplanes departed about 5 minutes apart, and the standard route of flight was southwest, over an area of remote inland fjords, coastal waterways, and mountainous tree-covered terrain. 


When the airplane failed to return to Ketchikan, the operator initiated a search for the missing airplane and heard an emergency locator transmitter (ELT) signal along the accident pilot's anticipated route of flight. A helicopter from Temsco Helicopters, Inc., of Ketchikan, was dispatched to the suspected accident site to search for the missing airplane. However, the helicopter pilot said that he was unable to search the upper levels of the mountainous areas due to low ceilings and poor visibility. The helicopter pilot said that, after waiting for the weather conditions to improve, he was able to search the upper elevations of the search area and located the wreckage about 1429. The Ketchikan Volunteer Rescue Squad (KVRS) team members reached the accident site and confirmed that the airplane's occupants had sustained fatal injuries. 


The NTSB investigator-in-charge along with another NTSB investigator, with help from KVRS, reached the accident site on the morning of June 27. The airplane impacted trees and a near vertical rock face in a nose high, wings level attitude at an elevation of about 1,600 feet mean sea level and came to rest upright on top of its separated floats, in an area of heavily forested, steep terrain. 


The accident airplane was equipped with an avionics package known as automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast (ADS-B), which is also known as "Capstone." ADS-B technology provides pilots with situational awareness by displaying the airplane's position over terrain, while using GPS technology, coupled with an instrument panel mounted, moving map display. The ADS-B equipment installed in the accident airplane included two Chelton multifunction display (MFD) units. One MFD provides the pilot with a moving map with terrain awareness information, and the other provides primary flight display information. The two MFD units were removed from the wreckage and shipped, to the NTSB vehicle recorder laboratory, Washington, D.C. 


The accident airplane was equipped with a Pratt & Whitney PT6A-135A engine that produces 750 shaft horsepower. 


A comprehensive NTSB postaccident examination of the engine and airframe is pending, after the airplane wreckage is recovered to Ketchikan. 



The closest weather reporting facility is Ketchikan Airport (KTN), Ketchikan, AK, about 24 miles southwest of the accident site. At 1153, an aviation routine weather report (METAR) at KTN reported in part: wind 130 degrees at 15 knots, gust 23 knots; visibility 6 statute miles, rain and mist, runway 11 visual range 4,000 variable to greater than 6,000 feet; few clouds 800 feet, broken clouds 1,200 feet, overcast clouds 2,700 feet; 61 degrees F; dew point 57 degrees F; altimeter 29.91 in Hg.