Additional Participating Entity:
Federal Aviation Administration / Flight Standards District Office; Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Aviation Accident Factual Report - National Transportation Safety Board: https://app.ntsb.gov/pdf
Investigation Docket - National Transportation Safety Board: https://dms.ntsb.gov/pubdms
Accident Number: CEN17FA231
Date & Time: 06/15/2017, 1115 CDT
Registration: G-SUNA
Aircraft: GEFA-FLUG GMBH AS-105-GD
Aircraft Damage: Destroyed
Defining Event: Aircraft structural failure
Injuries: 1 Serious
Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General Aviation - Other Work Use
On June 15, 2017, at 1115 central daylight time, a Gefa-Flug AS-105-GD thermal airship, United Kingdom registration G-SUNA, collided with the terrain in Hartford, Wisconsin, following an inflight envelope panel failure. The commercial pilot was seriously injured, and the thermal airship was destroyed. The airship was registered to and operated by AirSign LTD, as a 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 business flight. Visual meteorological conditions existed near the accident site at the time of the accident, and a flight plan had not been filed. The local flight departed from the Erin Aero Airport (WN75) at 1100 and was returning to the airport when the accident occurred.
The purpose of the flight was to provide aerial advertising for the U.S. Open Championship golf tournament. The accident occurred on the second flight of the day. The first flight of the day originated about 0830 and lasted 2 hours. After the first flight, the airship was fueled in preparation for the second flight. Three of the four propane tanks onboard were empty, so they were off-loaded and replaced with two full propane tanks. The pilot reported he checked the wind condition again and determined that although it was still within his flight parameters the wind would be increasing, which would make "flying more challenging." He had a goal to fly three hours that day, so he departed for the second flight, climbing to 1,000 ft. He stated the airship's no-wind forward speed is about 15 knots, and he didn't like flying in wind higher than 10 knots because it limited the airship's forward speed too much. The forward speed during the 15-minute flight was 4 to 6 knots, so he decided to land.
The pilot radioed the ground crew that he was returning because the wind was stronger than forecasted. He descended and released the 100 ft-long drop-line when he was about 150 ft above the ground (agl). He reported the line hung up on itself and did not extend the full length. The pilot reported that the Plexiglass slide panel in the gondola jammed, which had happened before, so he was not able to vent hot air from the envelope. The airship then encountered a thermal and it began to rise. The pilot thought that the increase in altitude would give him time to untangle the drop-line and unjam the Plexiglas panel. The airship leveled around 500 ft agl, at which time the pilot heard a "loud air explosion" which violently shook the airship. He looked up through the Plexiglass panel and a panel of fabric, located aft of his sitting position and the top of the envelope, was missing. Within seconds he heard up to four more air explosions but was unable to see any other missing or damaged panels as they were out of his sight range. The pilot reported the envelope began to sag and the forward speed of the airship resulted in the nose of the airship collapsing in and around the burners, which ignited the fabric. The pilot shut off the fuel to the burners and he secured his 5-point harness and tried to protect himself as best he could since he had no control over the airship as it descended on fire. After contacting the terrain, the pilot was able to get out of the gondola and crawled a short distance before the ground crew arrived and pulled him away from the wreckage.
Numerous witnesses reported seeing the airship descending for the landing, then rising before the envelope collapsed, and the airship then descending rapidly while on fire.
Pilot Information
Certificate: Commercial
Age: 49, Male
Airplane Rating(s): Multi-engine Land; Single-engine Land
Seat Occupied: Right
Other Aircraft Rating(s): Balloon
Restraint Used: 5-point
Instrument Rating(s): Airplane
Second Pilot Present: No
Instructor Rating(s): None
Toxicology Performed: No
Medical Certification: Class 2 With Waivers/Limitations
Last FAA Medical Exam: 08/17/2016
Occupational Pilot: Yes
Last Flight Review or Equivalent: 05/30/2016
Flight Time: 634.6 hours (Total, all aircraft), 316.7 hours (Total, this make and model), 607.6 hours (Pilot In Command, all aircraft)
The pilot held a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued commercial pilot certificate with single-engine land, multi-engine land, instrument and lighter-than-air ratings. He held a FAA issued second-class airman medical certificated dated August 17, 2016. There are no FAA pilot certificates for thermal airships.
In addition, the pilot held a commercial pilot license issued by the United Kingdom (UK) Civil Aviation Authority. The license included ratings for hot air balloons, Gp A hot air airships pressurized (up to 160,000 CuFt/4550Cu/m volume), free balloons hot air filled, and free balloons hot air Group A.
The pilot reported having made 117 airship flights for a total flight time of 316.7 hours.
Aircraft and Owner/Operator Information
Aircraft Make: GEFA-FLUG GMBH
Registration: G-SUNA
Model/Series: AS-105-GD
Aircraft Category: Blimp
Year of Manufacture:
Amateur Built: No
Airworthiness Certificate:
Serial Number: 0010
Landing Gear Type: None
Seats: 4
Date/Type of Last Inspection: 09/22/2016, Annual
Certified Max Gross Wt.: 1984 lbs
Time Since Last Inspection:
Engines: 1 Reciprocating
Airframe Total Time: 325 Hours
Engine Manufacturer: Rotax
ELT:
Engine Model/Series: 582UL
Registered Owner: AIRSIGN LTD
Rated Power: 65 hp
Operator: AIRSIGN LTD
Operating Certificate(s) Held: None
The airship and gondola were manufactured by the Gefa Flug GMBH in Germany, in 2004, and Gefa Flug GMBH is no longer in business. The current type certificate holder and manufacturer is Cameron Balloons Ltd. in Bristol, UK. The airship had a UK Certificate of Airworthiness issued on July 30, 2015.
The operator stated that they maintained the UK registration on the airship, because the United States does not have a certification category for thermal airships. If they had registered it in the United States, it would have been issued an experimental airworthiness certificate and they would not have been able to use it for hire. The most recent UK Airworthiness Review Certificate was issued on September 21, 2017.
The airship was maintained by a FAA Designated Airworthiness Representative (DAR). Work done on the envelope would be reviewed and signed off by a repairman on behalf of the British Balloon and Airship Club. The repairman reported he either had to see the repair or have proof that the repair was correct before signing off on the repair. The last entry in the envelope and engine/gondola logbooks was an annual inspection on September 22, 2016. The owner of the airship stated there was a tear in the bottom of the envelope earlier in the year which was repaired by the DAR. There was no record of the repair in the logbook and the repairman in the UK stated he was not aware of the tear or repair. This area of the envelope was destroyed in the fire.
The envelope was constructed from a coated nylon fabric with rip-stop load tapes along the entire length of the envelope. The envelope is an enclosed structure except for the keel opening above the pilot's seat which can be opened and closed using the sliding Plexiglas panel on the roof of the gondola and the pressure relief valves. The envelope forms an empennage with both vertical and horizontal fins. The vertical fin (rudder) can be deflected up to 45° in each direction. The airship was equipped with a rudder assist system. The gondola was connected to the envelope by four carabineer clips, one on each corner of the gondola, and snap hooks that were sewn into the envelope and hook. The envelope contained a manually operated rip panel in the empennage and two pressure relief valves at each end of the gondola. The pressure relief valves have elastic cords that stretched under pressure to allow air to escape if the envelope pressure is too great.
The gondola had a stainless-steel tubular frame. The front of the gondola was covered with a Plexiglass windscreen. The gondola had a 4-place tandem seating configuration. The pilot flies the airship from the front right seat. In the case of the accident airship, the two rear seats could not be occupied because the pilot normally carried four propane tanks, two of which restricted the rear seats. The roof of the gondola contained the Plexiglass panel that the pilot can slide to control the temperature within the envelope. The double burner was mounted on top of the frame above the sliding Plexiglass panel. The pusher engine was mounted on the rear of the gondola frame.
Engine power was provided by a liquid cooled Rotax 582 engine linked to a high-thrust, low-noise carbon fiber propeller. A fabric scoop behind the propeller directed airflow to pressurize the envelope and to provide oxygen to the burners.
The burner system was a V-configuration consisting of two burners which were fueled by liquid propane.
Meteorological Information and Flight Plan
Conditions at Accident Site: Visual Conditions
Condition of Light: Day
Observation Facility, Elevation: UES, 911 ft msl
Distance from Accident Site: 15 Nautical Miles
Observation Time: 1045 CDT
Direction from Accident Site: 155°
Lowest Cloud Condition: Scattered / 5000 ft agl
Visibility: 10 Miles
Lowest Ceiling: None
Visibility (RVR):
Wind Speed/Gusts: 7 knots /
Turbulence Type Forecast/Actual: /
Wind Direction: 270°
Turbulence Severity Forecast/Actual: /
Altimeter Setting: 29.83 inches Hg
Temperature/Dew Point: 25°C / 19°C
Precipitation and Obscuration: No Obscuration; No Precipitation
Departure Point: Hartford, WI (WN75)
Type of Flight Plan Filed: None
Destination: Hartford, WI (WN75)
Type of Clearance: None
Departure Time: 1100 CDT
Type of Airspace: Class E
The pilot reported that he checked the weather conditions on the morning of the accident using multiple websites including Intellicast, BlastValve, and Ryan Carlton; and by releasing weather balloons. He determined that the wind condition was not favorable for flight, but the wind speed was forecasted to decrease, so he delayed the flight. About 0800, he determined that the wind condition was favorable. He confirmed the decreased wind by releasing another weather balloon, using the websites previously mentioned, and ForeFlight.
The Waukesha County Airport (UES) was the closest official weather station, located 15 miles southeast of the accident site, and was equipped with an Automated Weather Observing Station (AWOS).
At 104515, UES AWOS reported wind from 270° at 7 knots.
At 1145, UES AWOS reported wind from 300° at 10 knots gusting to 15 knots.
The airship flight manual states:
The max. wind speed on takeoff site shall not exceed 12 knots for an experienced pilot and, as recommended, 8 knots for an inexperienced pilot.
WARNING: Flights in thermal or thundery conditions are not permitted.
Airport Information
Airport: Erin Aero Airport (WN75)
Runway Surface Type: N/A
Airport Elevation: 1000 ft
Runway Surface Condition: Unknown
Runway Used: N/A
IFR Approach: None
Runway Length/Width:
VFR Approach/Landing: None
Wreckage and Impact Information
Crew Injuries: 1 Serious
Aircraft Damage: Destroyed
Passenger Injuries: N/A
Aircraft Fire: In-Flight
Ground Injuries: N/A
Aircraft Explosion: On-Ground
Total Injuries: 1 Serious
Latitude, Longitude: 43.243333, -88.368611
The gondola came to rest on its left side in a hay field. The tubular steel structure, firewall, burners, engine, and propeller were intact, but burned. The Plexiglass and aluminum structures were destroyed by the fire. The steel cables that attach the gondola to the envelope remained attached at the gondola. All three of the propane tanks exploded in the postimpact fire.
The aft end of the envelope remained intact with the forward end of the envelope having been destroyed by fire. The remaining envelope was laid out for examination. The rudder lines were located attached to the rudder surface. The forward portion of both rudder lines were destroyed. There were several tears in the envelope along hoop tapes (LB) 9, 10, and 11, and between gores 29 and 3 and 6. The location of the tears were near the crown of the envelope just forward of the gondola. Most of the tears were along seam lines except for one which ran down the gore 30 fabric between LB 9 and 11 The area surrounding the torn sections of fabric was destroyed by the fire.
Tests And Research
The torn section of the envelope was examined at Cameron Balloons USA on July 5, 2017. A 24-inch square of the envelope from gore 1 between LB 10 and LB 11 was cut out for grab and tear tests. This piece of fabric was then cut into 12 pieces. The test results were above the minimum allowable for the fabric. It is unknown how the exposure to the fire affected the integrity of the fabric. The stitching along the hoops tapes and patches appeared to have been done in an acceptable manner.
14 CFR Part 91: General Aviation
Accident occurred Thursday, June 15, 2017 in Erin, WI
Aircraft: GEFA-FLUG GMBH AS-105-GD, registration: G-SUNA
Injuries: 1 Serious.
This is preliminary information, subject to change, and may contain errors. Any errors in this report will be corrected when the final report has been completed. NTSB investigators either traveled in support of this investigation or conducted a significant amount of investigative work without any travel, and used data obtained from various sources to prepare this aircraft accident report.
On June 15, 2017, at 1115 central daylight time, a Gefa-Flug AS-105-GD thermal airship, United Kingdom registration G-SUNA, collided with the terrain in Erin, Wisconsin, following an inflight envelope panel failure. The commercial pilot was seriously injured, and the thermal airship was destroyed. The airship was registered to and operated by AirSign LTD, as a 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 business flight. Visual flight rules conditions existed near the accident site at the time of the accident, and a flight plan had not been filed. The local flight departed from the Erin Aero Airport (WN75) at 1100, and was returning to the airport when the accident occurred.
The accident occurred on the second flight of the day. Prior to takeoff on the accident flight, the airship was fueled and two of the propane tanks were swapped out with full tanks. The airship departed for the aerial advertising flight and shortly after takeoff, the pilot radioed the ground crew that he was returning because the wind was too strong.
Following the accident, the pilot reported to law enforcement, that he was at an altitude of about 1,000 ft above ground level (agl) when he decided to return to land. He was approaching the airstrip and at an altitude of about 200 ft (agl), he encountered a thermal which increased his altitude to 500 ft. He vented the envelope to descend and heard an envelope panel tear. Seconds later, he heard another panel tear. The pilot turned off the fuel to the burners and vented the envelope, but the front section of the envelope collapsed around the burners and caught fire. The airship descended in a nose-down attitude until it impacted the terrain.
DATE: 06-20-2017
SUBJECT: ADVERTISING BLIMP CRASH-UPDATE 17-22192, 17-22212
AUTHORITY: SHERIFF DALE K. SCHMIDT
The Sheriff’s Office is confirming reports that it investigated a complaint on 06-15-2017 in regards to the Airsign aircraft prior to the aircraft actually crashing.
At 8:53 am on that date, the Sheriff’s Office received a complaint from a property owner near the private airstrip where the aircraft launched. During the original call, the complainant advised that the aircraft was scaring his cattle. He also was concerned that the aircraft may be violating permits/regulations during its operation.
Near the end of the call, the complainant asked if he could “…shoot it down?” The dispatcher advised no, and that a Deputy was on his way to meet with him. The question was asked in a sarcastic manner, but could be construed as a vague threat.
The Deputy did meet with the complainant, advised him on his concerns and determined that he was not a threat to the aircraft.
At 11:15 am, the aircraft was seen in distress and crashed. Investigators were almost immediately assigned to locate and interview the complainant from earlier in the morning. He was located, and during a thorough interview, denied any involvement in the aircraft crash.
Through interviews, evidence at the crash site, witnesses and other information, there is no reason to believe this person was involved, in any way, with the aircraft crash.
Additionally, from the same evidence and information, there is no reason to believe foul play is involved with the crash of the aircraft. If any new information develops, it will be investigated.
The NTSB has an open investigation, and it is hoped they will be able to make a determination as to the cause of the crash. No reports or recordings will be released at this time.
No comments:
Post a Comment