ALBUQUERQUE >> Look out, Bambi. You're still in danger from drones in New Mexico.
On Thursday, the State Game Commission decided to wait until next
month to consider outlawing hunters from using drones in New Mexico.
"We'll take a good, hard look to see if it's within our power to get
an outright ban," commission chairman Paul Kienzle said as the
seven-member board unanimously voted to table a proposal that would
prohibit what scientists call "unmanned aerial systems" from tracking
down big game by monitoring their activity from the air.
"It's a fair chase issue," Robert Griego, colonel of field operations
at the New Mexico Game and Fish Department told New Mexico Watchdog.
"That's what we always want to maintain. We don't want things to get to
the point where it's just like shooting fish in a barrel."
"A person can use a drone to find a trophy animal or simply find all
the animals and get a head start on other hunters," said John Crenshaw,
board president of the New Mexico Wildlife Federation. "It's unfair to
the hunters and it's unfair to the game."
"It's just wrong," said Elisabeth Dicharry, an open spaces advocate
from Los Lunas who wants to see an outright ban. "All species (such as
coyotes and prairie dogs) should not be hunted with drones."
The federal Airborne Hunting Act prohibits the use of aircraft to
track or shoot animals, but there is no federal law covering drones.
The measure tabled Thursday would make it illegal to use drones "to
signal an animal's location, to harass a game animal or to hunt a
protected species observed from a drone within 48 hours."
"It's starting to grow nationwide," said Oscar Simpson, chairman of
the New Mexico chapter of Backcountry Hunters and Anglers. "I was
talking to some sportsmen people here in New Mexico over the last nine
months and I had three of them say their hunts were screwed up because
somebody used a drone to move an elk out of the way, or to move it down
to where they were."
New Mexico isn't the only state to consider outlawing drones for hunting.
Alaska, Colorado and Montana have already passed bans, and a
combination of sportsmen's groups and animal protection agencies are
calling for states across the country to join in.
"As the price of drones comes down, they have a lot of potential for
abuse," Crenshaw told commissioners. "It seems the electronics is
outrunning the rulemaking."
While using drones for hunting is under fire, drones have also been
used in places such as Africa to protect animals against poachers and to
track the movement of herds for wildlife research.
"You'd look at having a research, a law enforcement exception," Kienzle said after the meeting.
In an unusual twist, in Massachusetts, representatives of the People
for the Ethical Treatment of Animals used drones to videotape hunters in
the field. PETA said it did so to make sure hunters were obeying the
law.
"To me, using drones to monitor wildlife or monitor hunters, that would be harassment," Simpson said.
The New Mexico Game Commission plans to bring the issue up again when it meets next month in Ruidoso.
Drones aren't new to New Mexico.
The state is home to the only flight test center approved by the
Federal Aviation Administration — the Unmanned Aerial Systems Technical
Analysis and Applications Center at New Mexico State University — that
flies and tests drones in the southern portion of the state.
Drone deployment has spiked across the country in recent years.
They've been employed, for example, by highway officials to check
traffic conditions and by forest rangers to track forest fires.
Last December, amazon.com executives unveiled plans to use drones to deliver packages.
But there's been pushback, with some civil libertarians expressing
concern about drones being used as "Big Brother" and invading privacy.
Legislation was introduced in Louisiana and an ordinance put up for a
vote in Colorado that went so far as to allow property owners to shoot
down drones for trespassing. Neither measure passed.
http://www.currentargus.com
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment