Friday, April 28, 2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RAUL OSVALDO ROSALES, a/k/a Saulo Solorazano, a/k/a Saulo Solorzano; Raul Osvaldo Rosales, Appellant

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
District Court No. 2-15-cr-00085-002
District Judge: The Honorable Jan E. DuBois
Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a)
March 23, 2017
Before: SMITH, Chief Judge, JORDAN, and ROTH, Circuit Judges

Filed: April 19, 2017

This disposition is not an opinion of the full court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.

SMITH, Chief Judge.

Raul Rosales appeals a District Court order denying a motion to suppress evidence.  For the following reasons, we will affirm.

The following facts, taken from the District Court’s memorandum opinion resolving the motion to suppress evidence, are not in dispute. 

On February 3, 2015, pilot Warren Nichols departed Los Angeles, California, in a small airplane.  The plane made a series of stops.  Raul Rosales accompanied Nichols as the sole passenger starting in at least Albuquerque, New Mexico.  The next morning at 2:00 a.m., the two men landed at Wings Air Field, a small, rural airport outside Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

While in the air, the flight was monitored by the Air and Marine Operations Center (AMOC), a division of the Department of Homeland Security.

Read more here:

1 comment:

  1. You are never quite under the wire dude.

    HS is watching. I am glad they are watching.

    Where I go and what I do does not require a motion to suppress evidence (of something).


Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.