Monday, March 23, 2015

Hawker Sea Fury FB.10, N13HP Fatal accident occurred February 18, 2014 in Breckenridge, Texas

National Transportation Safety Board - Aviation Accident Final Report: http://app.ntsb.gov/pdf 

Docket And Docket Items -  National Transportation Safety Board:   http://dms.ntsb.gov/pubdms

National Transportation Safety Board -   Aviation Accident Data Summary:   http://app.ntsb.gov/pdf

NTSB Identification: CEN14FA143
14 CFR Part 91: General Aviation
Accident occurred Tuesday, February 18, 2014 in Breckenridge, TX
Probable Cause Approval Date: 02/29/2016
Aircraft: HAWKER SEA FURY ISS 25, registration: N13HP
Injuries: 1 Fatal.

NTSB investigators either traveled in support of this investigation or conducted a significant amount of investigative work without any travel, and used data obtained from various sources to prepare this aircraft accident report.

After several hours of ground instruction and one solo flight, the private pilot was making only his second takeoff in a single-seat Hawker Sea Fury airplane. Two witnesses standing at midfield reported hearing abnormal engine and propeller sounds during takeoff, and the airplane’s speed seemed to be slower than normal. 

Another witness, who had pilot experience in the Hawker Sea Fury, did not see the takeoff but reported that he could clearly hear the engine “screaming,” and he knew at that moment that the accident pilot was experiencing a propeller overspeed. A flight instructor was conducting a formation takeoff in trail behind the accident airplane to observe the flight. 

After his takeoff, he joined in on the right side of the accident airplane and he heard the accident pilot make a radio transmission that he had an overspeed and the airplane’s rpm was at 3,500. The instructor reported that the maximum takeoff power was about 2,900 rpm. No further transmissions from the accident pilot were heard. The instructor kept repeating for the pilot to pull the power back and keep the nose down. 

Both airplanes climbed to about 1,000 ft above ground level, and the accident airplane began a slow turn to the left. The flight instructor continued to fly in formation with the accident airplane and continued to transmit instructions to the accident pilot to lower the nose and reduce the throttle.

However, the accident airplane continued to slow and fly in a nose-up attitude until it stalled and rolled to the right. It then entered a vertical nose-down dive and impacted terrain. The flight instructor and witnesses reported that there was an immediate explosion and postimpact fire.

The witnesses’ description of abnormal engine and propeller sounds and the accident pilot’s report of 3,500 rpm are indicative of a runaway propeller. The Hawker Sea Fury emergency checklist indicated that recovery from a runaway propeller was possible when following the procedures listed in the checklist, which include reducing the throttle, decreasing the propeller angle, and maintaining an airspeed of 140 knots.

A postaccident examination of the airframe and engine revealed no evidence of mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. A laboratory examination of the impact- and thermally damaged propeller regulator did not show any obvious evidence of preimpact mechanical malfunction or abnormalities. The cause of the runaway propeller could not be undetermined.

The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident as follows:

The pilot’s inadequate emergency response to a runaway propeller and his failure to maintain airspeed, which resulted in the airplane exceeding its critical angle-of-attack and stalling. The cause of the runaway propeller was undetermined.

HISTORY OF FLIGHT

On February 18, 2014, about 1638 central standard time, a Hawker Sea Fury ISS-25 single-engine, single-seat airplane, N13HP, was destroyed after impacting terrain during climb at Stephens County Airport (BKD), Breckenridge, Texas. The pilot was fatally injured. The airplane was registered to Breckenridge Aviation Museum; Breckenridge, Texas, and at the time of the accident was in the process of changing registration to J R Consulting NV, LLC; Midland, Texas. It was operated by a private individual. Visual meteorological conditions (VMC) prevailed at the time of the accident and a flight plan had not been filed for the 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 instructional flight.

The accident pilot had one previous flight earlier that morning, which had lasted about 20 minutes, and he was making only his second takeoff in a Hawker Sea Fury. Several witnesses near the runway at mid-field were actively watching as the southbound accident airplane took off. They reported hearing abnormal engine and propeller sounds and the airplane's vertical climb speed seemed to be slower than normal. One witness, who had pilot experience in the Hawker Sea Fury, reported that he could clearly hear the engine "screaming", and he knew at that moment that the accident pilot was experiencing a propeller overspeed.

The flight instructor was flying in a second single-seat Hawker Sea Fury airplane and was conducting a formation takeoff in trail behind the accident airplane. He reported that maximum takeoff power for the Hawker Sea Fury was about 2,900 rpm at about 50 inches of manifold pressure. After his takeoff in the second airplane he joined in on the right side of the accident airplane and he heard the accident pilot make one radio transmission that his "rpm was at 3,500". No further transmissions from the accident pilot were heard. Both airplanes climbed to about 1,000 feet above ground level (agl) and about one mile from the runway the accident airplane began a slow turn to the left. During this time the flight instructor was flying formation on the accident airplane and continued to transmit instructions to the accident pilot to lower the nose and reduce the throttle.

The accident airplane had almost completed a left turn to the downwind, had descended to about 500 feet above the ground, was slowing, and was flying in a nose-up attitude. The flight instructor reported that he saw the accident airplane stall and suddenly roll to the right. It then entered a vertical nose-down dive and impacted terrain. The flight instructor and witnesses reported that there was an immediate explosion and postimpact fire.

PERSONNEL INFORMATION

The pilot, age 38, held an FAA private pilot certificate issued on December 4, 2012, with a rating in only airplane single engine land. He also held an unrestricted FAA third-class medical certificate, which was issued on August 6, 2012.

The pilot's personal logbooks were not available for examination by the NTSB during the course of the investigation. Based on a review of copies of partial pilot logbook entries, FAA documents, and statements from witnesses and other persons, the pilot's total flight experience on February 1, 2014, was estimated as a total of 527 hours in all aircraft, which included about 100 hours of pilot experience in a P-51 Mustang, and no previous experience in a Hawker Sea Fury airplane.

AIRCRAFT INFORMATION

The low-wing, retractable conventional landing gear, single seat, single-engine airplane, manufacturer's serial number (s/n) 37536, was built in 1956 by Hawker Aircraft Limited.
It was originally powered by a 2,480 horsepower Bristol Centaurus 18-cylinder radial engine, and then had a maximum takeoff weight of 14,650 pounds and a listed maximum speed of 400 knots, which made it one of the fastest production single engine piston fighters ever built.

After being imported to the United States in 1976 the airplane had been extensively modified. In 1989, it was issued an FAA airworthiness certificate in the experimental exhibition category.

At the time of the accident the airplane was powered by a 2,800 horsepower Wright R-3350-26WD "Duplex Cyclone" 18-cylinder engine, with a displacement of 3,350 cubic inches. The geared nose case of the R-3350-26WD engine had an output gear ratio of 0.4375:1 which provided a propeller rpm of 1,225 at an engine rpm of 2,800.

The engine drove a 13 foot 6 inch diameter Aero Products A642 –G805 four-blade propeller which had a blade angle range of 40 degrees, from 27.5 degrees at low angle to 67.5 degrees at high angle. The hollow steel propeller blades were controlled by a doughnut-shaped hydraulic propeller regulator unit mounted on the propeller aft of the propeller hub and forward of the engine nose case.

Aircraft maintenance logbooks could not be located during the course of the investigation. Based on interviews with persons at the scene the accident pilot was probably carrying the maintenance logbooks inside the cockpit of the accident airplane and the maintenance logbooks were most likely consumed in the postimpact fire.

Based on FAA records and records from the Inspection Authority mechanic, the accident airplane had completed a satisfactory annual condition inspection on February 7, 2014. The flight times on that date were estimated as an aircraft total time of 2,102.2 hours, and estimated engine and propeller total times of 902.2 hours.

METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATION

At 1630 the Automated Surface Observation System at BKD reported wind from 260 degrees at 10 knots gusting to 18 knots, visibility 7 miles, clear of clouds, temperature 30 degrees Celsius (C), dew point 7 degrees C, and an altimeter setting of 29.83 inches of mercury.

Data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration showed that, at the accident location, at 1638, the altitude of the sun was about 20 degrees above the horizon and the azimuth of the sun was about 241 degrees. Apparent sunset occurred at 1824.

COMMUNICATIONS

The Unicom radio frequency at BKD was not recorded.

AIRPORT INFORMATION

The FAA Airport/ Facility Directory, South Central U. S., indicated that BKD was a non-towered airport with a field elevation of 1,284 feet mean sea level (msl). The longest runway was 17-35, which was an asphalt runway 4,997 feet long by 100 feet wide. Runway 17 was oriented to 180 degrees true and 173 degrees magnetic. Records show that runway 17 had a 0.5 percent upslope gradient to the south. Other shorter runways at BKD were also listed.

WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATION

The wreckage was located on dirt and rocky terrain in a remote wooded area at an estimated elevation of about 1,250 feet msl about 1 mile southeast from BKD. Evidence at the scene showed the airplane impacted in a nearly vertical nose-down attitude. There was evidence of a postimpact fire which thermally damaged most of the vegetation within a diameter of more than 100 feet.

The initial impact crater was about 1 foot deep and about 5 feet in diameter. The completely separated front section of the engine was found upright on the southeast edge of the impact crater. The propeller hub remained attached to the engine's propeller shaft and two blades of the propeller remained attached to the propeller hub. The other two blades were completely impact separated from the hub, but were found adjacent to the engine and impact crater. The propeller blades showed evidence of leading edge impact damage and showed evidence of chordwise smearing on the blade faces. Broken tree limbs almost directly above the separated engine had impact damage which corresponded to the damage to several of the propeller blades. Broken tree branches from those overhead limbs littered the area. Dirt and rock ejecta from the crater was found mostly to the east and within about 30 feet from the crater.

The engine was examined on-scene and the engine oil filter was removed from the wreckage and disassembled. The examination of the engine oil filter showed no evidence of preaccident contamination.

The completely separated outer portion of the right wing was located about 20 feet to the north-northwest from the impact crater. The upright right wing had impact damage which corresponded to damage on adjacent trees. The right aileron remained attached to its attach points.

The completely separated wing, including the spars, right flap, both flap actuators, both main landing gear, and the left aileron were located upright about 45 feet east from the initial impact crater and were oriented with the leading edge of the wing to the south, and with the long dimension of the wing spars oriented east-west. The flap actuators were in the up position and both main landing gear legs were observed in the up or retracted position. The fuel caps were impact damaged and thermally damaged, but were intact and remained latched and closed.

Almost all portions of magnesium structure in the separated wing section had been completely consumed by fire and had left a fine white ash which had a distinctive smell. The same fine white ash covered much of the entire accident scene for a distance of more than 50 feet in all directions. All aluminum and steel portions of the separated wing spar were thermally damaged with evidence of puddled aluminum in some areas.

The empennage was located about 70 feet east-northeast from the initial impact crater and was completely separated from the fuselage, oriented to 210 degrees, and was resting upright about 20 degrees left side down. The horizontal stabilizer, elevator, vertical stabilizer, and rudder remained attached and did not show signs of significant impact damage. The tail wheel was retracted into its wheel well. The empennage and tail section had thermal damage which consumed or damaged most of the exterior paint, and partially consumed part of the aluminum skin on the empennage and tail surfaces. The completely separated left flap was located under the left side of the empennage. Flight control continuity was confirmed from the elevator and rudder to the separations at the front of the empennage.

The upper section of the cockpit fuselage was mostly consumed by fire and almost unrecognizable. Portions of the instrument panel had completely separated and were located mostly within about 30 feet to the south and southeast from the empennage. The completely separated cockpit canopy frame was located about 20 feet west from the empennage. Portions of the completely separated canopy rail were located about 30 feet east from the empennage. The cockpit seat frame was completely separated and located about 10 feet east from the front end of the empennage.

The portion of the wreckage most distant from the initial impact crater was the completely separated rear section of the engine, which included the supercharger section and accessory gearbox. It was located 95 feet to the east on a bearing of 085 degrees from the initial impact crater.

All portions of the airplane were accounted for at the accident scene. Impact and thermal damage to the wreckage prevented an examination of the ignition system or the induction system components and prevented a complete assessment of flight control continuity.

The on-scene examination of the wreckage revealed no evidence of preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation.

MEDICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL INFORMATION

An autopsy was performed on the pilot by the Tarrant County Office of the Chief Medical Examiner in Fort Worth, Texas.

Forensic toxicology was performed on specimens from the pilot by the FAA Civil Aerospace Medical Institute (CAMI), Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. The toxicology report stated that tests for carbon monoxide and for cyanide were not performed, ethanol was not detected in vitreous, and no listed drugs were detected in blood.

TESTS AND RESEARCH

The propeller regulator, including the control input rod ends, mechanical controller, internal hydraulic gear pump assembly, and the drive gear were removed from the wreckage and were examined at the NTSB Materials Laboratory in Washington, D. C.

Examination of the broken control input connecting rod showed the fracture surfaces were consistent with fracture from bending overstress.

The drive gear had deformation which was consistent with twisting and bending. Four of the gear teeth contained smear marks on their aft faces which was consistent with teeth-shaped witness marks on the forward face of the hydraulic gear pump housing. A 0.5 inch long radial tear exhibited characteristics consistent with overstress fracture. A key inside the circumferential face of the gear bore was still in place in the gear slot and exhibited smearing and deformation consistent with impact with an adjacent part and corresponded with similar marks on the inner face of the drive gear bore.

The hydraulic gear pump was still attached to the surrounding propeller housing that had fractured and separated from the rest of the airplane. The fracture surfaces were consistent with overstress fracture.

The pump assembly was removed from the fractured housing. Two of the three bolts were still fixed with safety wire attached. The inboard faces of the pump exhibited darkening and soot consistent with fire exposure. The right inboard side of the forward face of the pump exhibited four teeth-shaped impressions. Those witness marks corresponded with the smear marks on the drive gear teeth. The shape of the gear marks was consistent with the drive gear rotating clockwise (forward looking aft).

The rear and sides of the housing exhibited a few indications of damage. The most notable area was one of the side flanges with a bolt hole that had been worn away. The four bolts in the aft of the pump were still in place, with the safety wire affixed.

The hydraulic pump was disassembled and examined. The surfaces were covered in a gelatinous substance consistent with dried hydraulic fluid which left gear teeth impressions on the surfaces, consistent with the position of the gears at the time of the accident. The cylindrical surfaces exhibited longitudinal marks consistent with the positions of the internal gear teeth crests. Ferrous corrosion product was present in the housing interior. However, this corrosion product was confined to the corners of each gear recess. The pattern of corrosion was consistent with pooled water after the accident. There were no indications of excessive wear or smearing on the interior housing surfaces. None of the channels for hydraulic fluid flow contained any indications of blockage.

An examination of the hydraulic pump gears after removal from the pump showed that they were relatively undamaged and were able to be rotated about their shafts. The exterior faces of the gear teeth exhibited some rotational wear marks, consistent with typical service wear. The teeth exhibited some ferrous corrosion product, which was limited to four of the forward teeth faces and two gear teeth valleys on each gear. This corrosion was consistent with pooled water incurred after the accident.

The laboratory examination of the impact damaged and thermally damaged propeller regulator and other parts revealed no evidence of preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

According to the Checklist for the Hawker Sea Fury: the Emergency Checklist procedure for "Runaway Propeller" on page 36 states:

"Failure of the governor to operate properly may result in a runaway propeller. A runaway propeller goes to full low pitch and may result in an engine rpm of 3600 or more. When such a failure occurs, the only method of reducing rpm is to pull the throttle back and decrease airspeed. In doing this, it is highly important to reduce airspeed in order to maintain the maximum horsepower available. The following procedure is recommended:

Throttle . . . . . . . . . . .REDUCED (2900 RPM)
Propeller . . . . . . . . . .DECREASE

Note: In case of an overspeed, moving the propeller control lever toward DECREASE may bring the propeller under control.

Airspeed . . . . . . . . . .140 KNOTS

Raise the nose to lose speed and then return to level flight attitude keeping IAS at approximately 140 knots.

When over a landing area, lower the gear and make an approach at normal landing speed.

Caution: If engine rpm cannot be kept within limits, expect the engine to quit or seize at any time".

Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . .ASAP"

According to the Department of Energy Handbook DOE-HDBK-1081-94, December 1994
Magnesium Properties – on pages 20 through 22, and page 34 states:

"The ignition temperature of massive magnesium is very close to its melting point of 1,202 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Solid metal ignition of magnesium can occur at 1,153 degrees F. Metal marketed under different trade names and commonly referred to as magnesium may be one of a large number of different alloys containing magnesium, but also significant percentages of aluminum, manganese, and zinc. Some of these alloys have ignition temperatures considerably lower than pure magnesium, and certain magnesium alloys will ignite at temperatures as low as (800 degrees F). Flame temperatures of magnesium and magnesium alloys can reach (2,500 degrees F)."

"The more massive a piece of magnesium, the more difficult it is to ignite, but once
ignited, magnesium burns intensely and is difficult to extinguish".


According to "Civil Pilot Accident Experience With High Performance Military Surplus Type Aircraft" (1967); R. G. Snyder: The study of one particular type of military type aircraft during a 26 month period showed that, of the 80 operational airplanes of that type, 25 of the airplanes were involved in aircraft accidents which resulted in 12 fatalities and 4 serious injuries. The conclusions on page 32 noted that the "major cause of these accidents was overwhelmingly pilot experience".

http://registry.faa.gov/N13HP

NTSB Identification: CEN14FA143
14 CFR Part 91: General Aviation
Accident occurred Tuesday, February 18, 2014 in Breckenridge, TX
Aircraft: HAWKER SEA FURY ISS 25, registration: N13HP
Injuries: 1 Fatal.

This is preliminary information, subject to change, and may contain errors. Any errors in this report will be corrected when the final report has been completed. NTSB investigators either traveled in support of this investigation or conducted a significant amount of investigative work without any travel, and used data obtained from various sources to prepare this aircraft accident report.


On February 18, 2014, about 1638 central standard time, a Hawker Sea Fury ISS-25 single-engine airplane, N13HP, was destroyed after impacting terrain during initial climb at Stephens County Airport (BKD), Breckenridge, Texas. The pilot was fatally injured. The airplane was registered to Breckenridge Aviation Museum, Breckenridge, Texas, and was reportedly in the process of changing registration at the time of the accident; it was operated by a private individual. Visual meteorological conditions (VMC) prevailed at the time of the accident and a flight plan had not been filed for the 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 instructional flight.


The flight instructor was flying in a second airplane and was conducting a formation takeoff in trail behind the accident airplane. He reported that normal takeoff power was about 2,900 revolutions per minute (rpm) at about 45 inches of manifold pressure. Several witnesses near the runway were actively watching both airplanes and reported hearing abnormal sounds as the accident airplane passed them at mid-field. One witness described the noise as obviously being a propeller overspeed and the airplane's vertical climb speed seemed to be slower than normal.


The flight instructor reported that after takeoff he joined in on the right side of the accident airplane and heard the accident pilot make one radio transmission that his "rpm was at 3,500". No further transmissions were heard. Both airplanes climbed to about 800 feet above ground level (agl) and about two miles from the runway the accident airplane began a slow turn to the left. The flight instructor continued to transmit instructions to the accident pilot to lower the nose and reduce the throttle. 


The accident airplane completed a turn to the downwind and had descended to about 500 feet above the ground and was flying in a nose-up attitude. The flight instructor reported that he saw the accident airplane suddenly roll to the right and enter a vertical nose down dive. Evidence at the accident scene showed a near vertical impact and much of the airplane was consumed by the postimpact fire. 





Ray Hofman


A civil lawsuit claims late-Midland businessman Ray Hofman took millions of dollars from Peak Completion Technologies to “live it up like rock stars,” using that money to pay for expensive cars, private airplanes, and for his own personal use.

Filed Feb. 20 in Midland County’s 142nd District Court, the lawsuit states officials with the company learned of Hofman’s supposed siphoning of funds after his Feb. 18, 2014, death.

Officials with the Texas Department of Public Safety reported Hofman, the founder and then-president and CEO of Peak Completion, was flying four miles north of Breckenridge in a Hawker Sea Fury ISS-25, a fixed-wing, single-engine plane, when he “experienced a problem with handling causing the plane to nose dive and crash into a heavily wooded area.”

According to the lawsuit, Hofman owned 28 percent of the company.

Harper Estes, the attorney with Lynch, Chappell and Alsup who filed the lawsuit, did not return a call for comment Monday.

According to the lawsuit, Hofman submitted false invoices to Peak to pay for work done by SP Engineering — which builds and modifies custom automobile upgrades — and for an airplane.

Hofman was a well-known car collector locally and throughout the car community. 

According to the lawsuit, Hofman had numerous vehicles that included Mercedes-Benz, Ferraris, Bentleys and Porsches.

Hofman was also accused in the lawsuit of filing false expense reports for other employees of the company and then taking those checks and depositing them in his personal bank account.

Among the many other accusations, Hofman supposedly used the company’s money to pay for personal expenses such as utilities and the hiring of four full-time employees for his residence, according to the lawsuit.

Hofman’s wife, Janna Fulfer Hofman, is named in the suit as the independent executor of Hofman’s estate and did not respond for comment through phone call or social media.

Midland County District Clerk Ross Bush said Janna Hofman did not have an attorney on record. She is also accused of having knowledge of Ray Hofman’s supposed actions, according to the lawsuit.

The lawsuit went on to detail a number of stories showing the various ways Ray Hofman was accused of stealing money and how he reportedly spent the millions.

During the weekend of Nov. 15, 2013, Ray Hofman supposedly had the company pay for seven tickets to the Formula 1 race in Austin in which he said he would be entertaining clients for the business, according to the lawsuit.

None of the people in attendance were customers and Ray Hofman supposedly sent an email to a friend stating they would “live it up like rock stars,” according to the lawsuit.

Ray Hofman also supposedly asked for and received money for the Formula One tickets from three of his friends at about $5,000 a piece, according to the lawsuit.

While there, the group was also flown by helicopter to the race track at the cost of about $1,200 a day, which Ray Hofman supposedly had the company cover. During that trip, he also withdrew about $1,000 from the company’s account, according to the lawsuit.

The lawsuit also claims Ray Hofman used the company to purchase several vehicles.

One purchase was reported as a 2006 Ford GT in November 2011 which cost $182,768.63, according to the lawsuit.

Emails between Ray Hofman and the seller of the vehicle stated the two worked out the purchase of the Ford and once the money was wired, an invoice was sent to him claiming he had purchased parts for the company, according to the lawsuit.

A similar setup was used to purchase a 2012 Audi R8 GT worth $235,293.75 and a 2001 Lamborghini Pearl White 6.0 worth $145,000, according to the lawsuit.

In August 2011, Ray Hofman began the process of purchasing a Zero airplane replica from the film “Tora! Tora! Tora!” and sent an email to Peak’s accounting firm telling them to wire money to an account in Australia, according to the lawsuit. The reported total cost for the airplane was quoted at $168,000.

The plane was registered to JR Consulting NV, which Janna Hofman supposedly oversaw, and emails between Janna Hofman, Ray Hofman, and the broker of the airplane deal supposedly joked about how the couple would need more “hangar space,” according to the lawsuit.

The plane was later transferred to the Hofman Family Foundation, a nonprofit foundation created by the Hofmans, and received a tax deduction for the donation of the plane, according to the lawsuit.

To move the planes to air shows, Ray Hofman would hire a pilot friend and would send an invoice to Peak’s accounting department for paying a “hot shot” contractor, according to the lawsuit. “Hot shot” work is used for transporting tools to a well site.

The move supposedly cost the company about $2,785.30.

The Hofmans also used the money for personal use, which included Christmas toys for their children, a pirate ship playground in their backyard, and for remodeling done to their residence, according to the lawsuit.

The couple also hired a full-time housekeeper and nanny, where she was supposedly making about $60,000 while on Peak’s payroll, according to the lawsuit. They also supposedly hired a grounds keeper, a mechanic and a detailer on Peak’s payroll, according to the lawsuit.

The lawsuit claims the financial matters were kept hidden by Bob Dutton, of Dutton Harris and Company and also a defendant in the suit, because the company handled financial information for both Peak and the Hofmans, according to the lawsuit.

Instead of reporting discrepancies in the Hofman’s tax filings, different “tax strategies” were used to hide the assets, according to the lawsuit.

Dutton also supposedly helped hide the information when a sister company of Peak wanted to get a loan to obtain an airplane for company use, according to the lawsuit. A representative at Dutton’s office said he was not in the office Monday and attempts to reach him through social media were not successful.

When the bank requested monetary information about Ray Hofman to help secure the loan, Ray Hofman and Dutton supposedly drafted a way to keep much of the information hidden, and also joked to blame Janna for the delay in response, according to the lawsuit.

“We may just give them the w2s also for a quick response and blame jannas record keeping for delay on returns lol” Ray Hofman’s email was quoted in the lawsuit.

“You suck,” was the only response she had to the email, according to the lawsuit.

The lawsuit asks the defendants to pay Peak back the money, the attorney’s fees, and court costs.

Original article can be found here:  http://www.oaoa.com





On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 around 4 p.m., the life of father and business owner, Ray Hofman, was cut short when his plane crashed four miles north of Breckenridge, which is located northeast of Abilene. DPS officers working the scene said Hofman was flying a “Hawker Sea Fury Plane” he recently purchased when he experienced problems with the handling causing the plane to nose dive in a wooded area nearby.

A blog post by the CEO of the Commemorative Air Force, dedicated to the life of Ray Hofman, said Ray had a love for these planes since he was a boy.

He says Ray told him, “…His story about growing up in Canada and his childhood room covered with pictures of the CAF’s airplanes on the walls.”

Ray always got, “…The best instructors, bought the best aircraft and had them maintained by the best mechanics.”

The Hawker Sea Fury he was flying at the time of the crash is a British fighter aircraft known as the one of the fastest single piston engine aircrafts ever built.

He was also a lover of cars. His receptionist at Peak says, “Ray was an awesome, giving person! For the short time that I knew him, if he pulled up in his Ferrari, that meant he was in a good mood that day. Ray will be missed by a lot of people. I pray for his wife and kids, can’t imagine how hard this is right now. I pray that they find peace and comfort. It will never be the same around here. You will be missed, Ray!”

Steven Johnston shared on our Facebook, “I started working for Peak two weeks ago and was introduced to Ray my first day. He introduced himself and already new and called me by my first name. He welcomed me to the Peak family. To some this my not seem like a big deal but that showed me what kind of a man and boss he was. I only wish I could have known him better. R.I.P. Mr. Hofman.”

Before his death, Ray wanted to build a hangar across the street from the CAF to display his planes for the public to enjoy.

“He wanted to be close to the CAF so that he could help improve our museum with his collection of airplanes on display in our hangar – such generosity!” The CAF Blog, said.

Raymond Alan Hoffman was the President and CEO of Peak Completion Technologies.







Midland businessman dead: Plane crash claims car, plane enthusiast’s life

A Midland businessman died Tuesday afternoon after a plane crash in Breckenridge, according to several news outlets.

Ray Hofman, the president and CEO of Peak Completions, was flying a restored WWII fighter plane when it crashed at about 4 p.m. Tuesday, according to the Abilene Reporter-News and CBS 7 News.

Hofman was a vintage plane collector and car enthusiast, and many people in the car community posted their feelings about the man on Internet forums Tuesday and Wednesday.

John Hennessey, founder and president of Hennessey Performance out of Sealy, said he and Hofman got to know each other about 15 years ago, when Hennessey built a Dodge Viper for Hofman.

Hennessey said he hasn’t built a car for Hofman in seven to eight years, but was still saddened by the man’s death.

 “My experience was he was a gentleman and all-around good guy,” Hennessey said. “He liked fun, fast cars and eventually he got into fun, fast airplanes.”

Hennessey said while the two were busy and didn’t see each other often, he followed Hofman on Facebook and noted his new-found affinity for airplanes.

“It’s just a huge, huge loss for everybody that knew Ray,” Hennessey said. “My heart goes out to his wife and his boys. He’s one of those guys that will be missed by a lot of people.”

According to the Abilene Reporter-News, Hofman just bought the Hawker Sea Fury ISS-25 and was on a solo training flight when it crashed. The Reporter-News did not confirm Hoffman’s identity in its story.

Law enforcement later discovered the crash of the British Navy fighter plane, according to the Reporter-News.

According to a 2010 Midland Reporter-Telegram story about Hofman, he moved to Midland when he founded Peak Completions, an oilfield services company, in 2003, specializing in multi-lateral completion technologies.

10 comments:

  1. His death was the best thing for the company.

    Was it a suicide or accident?

    This is why every business absolutely must have good internal controls! Well designed internal controls protect assets from fraud. Ensure the reliability and integrity of financial information. Ensure that all management has accurate, timely and complete information, including accounting documentation/records, in order to monitor and report business operations. Preventive control activities aim to deter the instance of embezzlement - fraud.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You insensitive bitch, first of all you think that his death was the best thing that ever happened to the company? Do you even know Ray Hofman well enough to make these accusations? Ray Hofman is one of the main reasons peak Completions grew to the thriving conpany it is now and yet, you want to take that away from him? It's fine if you have a difference of opinion, but it is not right for you to say that "his death was the best thing for the company." Get a soul or something.

      Delete
  2. Attractive on the outside -- unholy attractive on the inside!

    Ray and Janna = Despicable and Greedy!

    Need to see the final accident report. Aviation is dangerous, something people routinely forget.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think Ray was a remarkable man. Friendly and likable. I will continue to think that until someone proves him guilty. It is sad to see people who automatically think some on is guilty without seeing the proof. I am counting n the best for that family and I feel sorry for those who instantly judge and use language like Despicable and Greedy when their is no proven guilt.

    ReplyDelete
  4. To tell the widow that her husband “stole” company money 10 minutes before she delivers her husband’s Eulogy at his funeral is pathetic. A year later your proof is a couple of assets which could have been his bonus for all we know…he did own 28% of the company and nobody can attest to what he agreed to with his partners. An accusation is a one-sided story by definition and I’m glad our courts review all of the evidence before passing judgment. I hope Janna continues to focus on her boys and leave this to the lawyers.

    ReplyDelete
  5. A whole bunch of stuff hit the fan right after he died. His CFO/Controller left Peak and went to Basic not long before he died. He did say Ray claimed substantial/enormous undocumented business expenses he wasn't comfortable with at all. Obviously the CFO didn't want to spend time any time in jail. He ran as fast as he could AWAY from Janna and Ray ----- that's a smart CFO.

    Accounting ethics and integrity standards is at the very top of the list for CFO's. The professional disciplines, understanding and upholding ethics is very important for Controllers/CFO's.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "Did he fake his own death?"

    Are you thinking he pulled a Marcus Schrenker, N428DC?

    Gotta love forensics accountants!

    ReplyDelete
  7. We did business with Peak, for a while. When they didn't pay their bills we started looking into the company and saw the extravagance of the CEO. It wasn't hidden. It was all over the world wide web...
    How the company can sue saying they were not aware of what was going on is ridiculous.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Smart thing to do would have been to keep the 3500rpms that got the plane off the ground and risk damaging the engine........or not........and being able to maintain enough speed to keep flying to the runway.

    Reducing the rpms was a huge mistake.

    ReplyDelete