Miami Herald > Opinion > Editorials
The news has been
scarier than usual: Iraq is on the boil, which has serious implications
for U.S. security, random and mass-shooting tragedies seem to be coming
at us weekly.
Add to these the fact that air-traffic controllers
are too sleepy, and anyone who boards a plane should be very afraid. The
controllers are suffering from chronic fatigue while on the job — the
task of keeping the millions of people who fly from here to there safe
in the air. It remains a major threat to the safety of the flying public
that the Federal Aviation Administration must address immediately.
It’s
not as if the FAA had no idea that too many of its 15,000 air-traffic
controllers are at risk of nodding off or sluggish thinking. Three years
ago, it was disclosed that there were controllers who were falling
asleep in front of their screens, which forced the FAA to take a closer
look at work scheduling, which has contributed to the problem.
This
latest disclosure is a result of a report, mandated by Congress, from
the National Research Council. At issue, short-term, is the policy that
allows controllers to work five eight-hour shifts over four consecutive
days — the last one being a midnight shift.
Controllers love it
because they get 80 hours — the equivalent of two traditional work weeks
— off before they have to return to work. However, the report says that
this scheduling likely results in “severely reduced cognitive
performance’’ during the midnight shift because of fatigue.
The
schedule might be popular, but it’s a dangerous one. The FAA should sit
down with the National Air Traffic Controllers Association and develop
scheduling that reduces fatigue on the job and increases flight safety.
To
its credit, the FAA imposed a fatigue risk management program after
several controllers were caught sleeping on the job a few years ago.
Cutbacks, however, have thwarted the program’s effectiveness. This is
not encouraging news. Neither is what’s roaring down the pike, coming
straight at helpless plane passengers and crew members at the mercy of
air-traffic controllers who might — or might not — be at the top of
their game. The FAA is confronting a deluge of retirements. Controllers
are required to retire when they turn 56. The agency will have to
replace about two-thirds of this workforce — 10,000 controllers — during
the next 10 years.
In order to fill the ranks, the FAA has
abandoned its hiring program, in place for almost 25 years, of
recruiting controllers from among military veterans who have aviation
experience and from FAA-accredited colleges and universities.
It’s
a controversial move that rightly raises concerns about safety. It
takes years to properly train air traffic controllers. It is imperative
that the FAA — along with Secretary of Transportation Anthony Foxx —
make a persuasive case that replacing recruits who have a leg up in
their knowledge of aviation with neophytes starting from scratch will
not further imperil people who fly.
The report makes several
recommendations, including that the FAA analyze accident and incident
reports and voluntary reports by controllers to identify specific links
between staffing and safety; involve controllers in staffing decisions;
and ensure sufficient staffing as its modernization initiative proceeds.
Next Generation Transportation System will shift from ground-based
radar to a satellite system. The agency must follow through.
Flying shouldn’t be a crap shoot because someone was asleep at the switch.
Source: http://www.miamiherald.com
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.