Thursday, January 05, 2017

Cozy Mark IV, registered to and operated by the pilot under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as a personal flight, N4518S: Accident occurred January 04, 2017 at Napa County Airport ( KAPC), California

The National Transportation Safety Board did not travel to the scene of this accident.

Additional Participating Entity:

Federal Aviation Administration / Flight Standards District Office; Sacramento, California

Aviation Accident Factual Report - National Transportation Safety Board:

Investigation Docket - National Transportation Safety Board:

Location: Napa, CA
Accident Number: WPR17LA048
Date & Time: 01/04/2017, 1430 PST
Registration: N4518S
Aircraft Damage: Substantial
Defining Event: Powerplant sys/comp malf/fail
Injuries: 1 None
Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General Aviation - Personal 

On January 4, 2017, about 1430 Pacific standard time, an experimental amateur-built Schosanski, Cozy MK IV R airplane, N4518S, collided with terrain following a partial loss of engine power at Napa County Airport (APC), Napa, California. The commercial pilot was not injured. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the left wing. The airplane was registered to and operated by the pilot under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as a personal flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan had been filed. The local flight departed Napa, California, about 1400 PST.

The pilot, and builder of the airplane, reported that he was practicing touch-and-go maneuvers on runway 24 at the time of the accident. After multiple tours in the airport traffic pattern the pilot noted he would be landing farther down the runway than he desired and initiated a go-around maneuver. As he advanced the throttle the engine started to respond normally, but then rolled back to an unknown lower power setting. The pilot decided to land on the remaining runway but the airplane over ran the end of the runway and came to rest in a marsh area beyond the departure end of the runway. During a postaccident interview, the pilot stated that the engine may have experienced a partial loss of power instead of a total power loss.

The pilot, age 72, held a commercial pilot certificate with ratings for single-engine land and instrument airplane. The pilot's most recent third-class medical certificate was issued on January 3, 2017, which included the limitation, "must have available glasses for near vision." According to the pilot, his flight time included 814 hours of total flight time in all airplanes, of which 331 hours had been accumulated in the airplane make and model.

According to FAA records, the airplane was manufactured in 1991. The airplane was powered by an automotive Mazda 13B rotary engine that was modified by the owner for use in the airplane. The pilot removed the turbo system, which derated the engine to 150 hp. Maintenance records showed that the airplane's most recent annual inspection was completed on July 29, 2016 at 205 flight hours by the pilot, who also held a repairman's certificate for this airplane. At the time of the accident, the engine had accumulated a total of 223 hours total time in service and 17 hours since the airplane's most recent inspection.

An industry expert reported there are approximately 400 Cozy MK IV airplanes in service; however, only about 6 of them are powered by Mazda 13B rotary engines.

Fuel System

The airplane was equipped with two inboard fuel tanks that each held 26 gallons and both were equipped with a high pressure fuel pump. During normal operation, fuel would flow from the chosen tank through a line directly to the fuel injectors at the engine. The right and left fuel lines "T" off and run to a fuel filter, which runs to a primary fuel rail and a secondary fuel rail. The fuel rails return fuel back to the gascolator and the selected fuel tank. If a tank is overfilled, the excess will be expelled through the tank's vent lines.

The engine uses fuel injectors with pulse activated electronic valves to admit fuel into the engine, which can be programmed to increase/decrease the pulse which determines how long the injectors will stay open and deliver fuel to the engine. The airplane's ignition controller manages the fuel injector settings based on rpm simultaneously with the three butterfly valves.

Engine Examination

A postaccident examination was completed by the pilot with oversight from a Federal Aviation Administration inspector. Both high pressure fuel pumps were tested and functioned normally. The fuel filter was free of contaminations. The fuel injectors functioned normally when tested using a diagnostic mode on the engine control unit (ECU) that simulates an engine run at 3,000 rpm. The spark plugs were partially corroded from the engine's exposure to salt water. A test of the resistance in the coils/igniters and ignition harness was performed in accordance with the Haynes Mazda Automotive Repair manual and functioned to specification. The ECU was also run in diagnostic mode with the spark plugs removed and each coil fired, which confirmed continuity from the ECU to the spark plugs through the igniters.


The ECU was designed to take information from the crank angle sensor, manifold pressure and air temperature sensor from the throttle body and send impulses to the coils and signals to the fuel injectors to moderate fuel flow and ignition power supplied to the spark plugs. A test of the ECU's timing would determine if it was delivering pulses at the appropriate intervals; however, this test could not be accomplished as it was built by an individual who no longer provides this service. The pilot verified that the crank angle sensor was properly aligned and in normal condition.

Apex Seals

Two park apex seals are installed in each of the three corners of each rotor to seal the edges of the rotor. According to a Mazda rotary engine conversion guide, this engine is susceptible to premature apex seal failures, which can be avoided by sufficient lubrication. This particular engine lubricated the apex seals with a two-stroke sump that delivered oil directly to the apex seals and designed to burn with a minimum of deposits, and functioned normally when tested. The top seals from one of the rotor sides was not recovered after the accident. The pilot presumed the damaged or missing apex seal caused the power loss, as the absence of this seal would significantly reduce engine power. 

Pilot Information

Certificate: Commercial
Age: 72, Male
Airplane Rating(s): Single-engine Land
Seat Occupied: Left
Other Aircraft Rating(s): None
Restraint Used: 4-point
Instrument Rating(s): Airplane
Second Pilot Present: No
Instructor Rating(s): None
Toxicology Performed: No
Medical Certification: Class 3 With Waivers/Limitations
Last FAA Medical Exam: 01/03/2017
Occupational Pilot: No
Last Flight Review or Equivalent: 03/26/2016
Flight Time:  867 hours (Total, all aircraft), 223 hours (Total, this make and model), 793 hours (Pilot In Command, all aircraft), 15 hours (Last 90 days, all aircraft), 4 hours (Last 30 days, all aircraft)

Aircraft and Owner/Operator Information

Registration: N4518S
Aircraft Category: Airplane
Year of Manufacture: 2012
Amateur Built: Yes
Airworthiness Certificate: Experimental
Serial Number: 0329
Landing Gear Type: Retractable - Tricycle
Seats: 4
Date/Type of Last Inspection: 07/29/2017, Annual
Certified Max Gross Wt.: 2050 lbs
Time Since Last Inspection: 17 Hours
Engines: 1 Reciprocating
Airframe Total Time: 223 Hours at time of accident
Engine Manufacturer: Mazda
ELT: C91A installed, activated, did not aid in locating accident
Engine Model/Series: 13B
Registered Owner: On file
Rated Power:
Operator: On file
Operating Certificate(s) Held: None

Meteorological Information and Flight Plan

Conditions at Accident Site: Visual Conditions
Condition of Light: Day
Observation Facility, Elevation: KAPC, 14 ft msl
Distance from Accident Site: 0 Nautical Miles
Observation Time: 1454 PST
Direction from Accident Site: 74°
Lowest Cloud Condition:
Visibility:  10 Miles
Lowest Ceiling: Broken / 4100 ft agl
Visibility (RVR):
Wind Speed/Gusts: 10 knots /
Turbulence Type Forecast/Actual: /
Wind Direction: 300°
Turbulence Severity Forecast/Actual: /
Altimeter Setting:
Temperature/Dew Point:
Precipitation and Obscuration: Light - Rain
Departure Point: Napa, CA (APC)
Type of Flight Plan Filed: None
Destination: Napa, CA (APC)
Type of Clearance: None
Departure Time: 1400 PST
Type of Airspace: Class D

Airport Information

Runway Surface Type: Asphalt
Airport Elevation: 35 ft
Runway Surface Condition: Standing Water; Wet
Runway Used: 24
IFR Approach: None
Runway Length/Width: 5007 ft / 150 ft
VFR Approach/Landing: Forced Landing; Go Around; Traffic Pattern

Wreckage and Impact Information

Crew Injuries: 1 None
Aircraft Damage: Substantial
Passenger Injuries: N/A
Aircraft Fire: None
Ground Injuries: N/A
Aircraft Explosion: None
Total Injuries: 1 None
Latitude, Longitude:  38.208889, -122.290000

NTSB Identification: WPR17LA048
14 CFR Part 91: General Aviation
Accident occurred Wednesday, January 04, 2017 in Napa, CA
Aircraft: SCHOSANSKI JOHN H COZY MK IV R, registration: N4518S
Injuries: 1 Uninjured.

This is preliminary information, subject to change, and may contain errors. Any errors in this report will be corrected when the final report has been completed. NTSB investigators may not have traveled in support of this investigation and used data provided by various sources to prepare this aircraft accident report.

On January 4, 2017, about 1430 Pacific standard time, an experimental amateur-built Schosanski, Cozy MK IV R airplane, N4518S, experienced a total loss of engine power after an attempted go-around during a touch-and-go landing at Napa County Airport (APC), Napa, California. The pilot subsequently made a forced landing on the remaining runway and the airplane overran the runway. The airplane was registered and operated by the owner/pilot under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 91. The commercial pilot was not injured. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the left wing. The local personal flight departed Napa, California, about 1400 PST. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed.

The pilot reported that he was in the traffic pattern performing touch-and-go landings on runway 24. During approach, the pilot noted that the airplane would have landed further down the runway than desired and he initiated a go-around. As he advanced the throttle, the engine responded normally, but then rolled back to idle. The pilot attempted to land on the remaining runway, but the airplane overran the end of the runway and came to rest in a marsh area.

The airplane was powered by an automotive Mazda rotary engine, which was modified by the owner. The airplane was recovered for further examination.

The National Transportation Safety Board is investigating Wednesday's plane crash at the Napa County Airport that left the plane damaged but the pilot uninjured.

“I don’t even think he has a scratch on him,” said Winona Boyer, airport administrative assistant.

The pilot, whom Boyer described as an “older gentleman,” is a licensed pilot and tenant at the airport. He flies frequently and has flown the plane that crashed – a Cozy Mark IV – for several years, Boyer said.

The owner said his engine "just kicked off,” Boyer said. The pilot landed in the nearby creek because he thought it would be easier than the runway, she said.

The landing was reported as “possible plane crash” along a departure runway at 2:26 p.m.

Cal Fire, Napa County Fire, California Highway Patrol, Napa County Sheriff’s Office, American Canyon Fire and American Medical Response all responded to the scene.
Get news headlines sent daily to your inbox

“It really made a mess,” Boyer said. “I think it probably totaled his aircraft but he was fine.”

The pilot was the only occupant.

Landings like this are not typical at the airport, Boyer said. The four-seat, single engine, homebuilt light aircraft, like other small planes, goes through annual maintenance, she said.

The NTSB investigates all civil aviation accidents in the U.S. The lead investigator on the case, Patrick Jones, did not respond to Register inquiries Friday morning.


NORTHERN CALIFORNIA – A pilot escaped injury in a Wednesday afternoon small plane crash at the Napa County Airport.

The crash, which involved only one plane, occurred just before 2:30 p.m. at the airport, located in Napa, according to Cal Fire Capt. Leah Simmons-Davis.

Simmons-Davis said Cal Fire/Napa County Fire responded with three engine companies, one volunteer company, a helicopter and a total of 14 personnel. Medical and law enforcement personnel also were on scene.

The aircraft was a small personal use airplane that crashed in an apparent attempt to take off from the airport, Simmons-Davis said.

The plane landed into a levee adjacent to the airport, with part of the landing gear submerged in water, Simmons-Davis said. The aircraft suffered major damage.

Simmons-Davis said the pilot was the only occupant, and there were no injuries.

She said the crash will be investigated by the National Transportation Safety Board.


A pilot was uninjured Wednesday afternoon after crashing an airplane while attempting to take off from the Napa County Airport, authorities said.

Emergency crews responded to the call at 2:26 p.m. as the pilot failed to take off and crashed into a levee next to the airport, according to Cal Fire. The pilot was flying solo.

The aircraft suffered major damage, Cal Fire said. The cause of the crash is under investigation by the National Transportation Safety Board.


The pilot of a small personal airplane was not injured after crashing the plane into a levee while attempting a takeoff at Napa County Airport on Wednesday afternoon, according to Cal Fire.

The aircraft hazard was reported as a “possible plane crash” along a departure runway at 2:26 p.m. Instead of taking off into the air, the aircraft headed into the water. Although no fuel was leaking from the plane, the aircraft had major damage, Cal Fire said.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.