Tuesday, December 01, 2015

Regional Airlines Seek Reduced Minimum Pilot-Experience Mandate: Goal is to raise safety bar while fixing “a broken pipeline” that is already producing too few acceptable applicants

The Wall Street Journal
Updated Dec. 1, 2015 4:42 p.m. ET

U.S. regional airlines are seeking to persuade regulators to roll back minimum-experience requirements before many future co-pilots are hired, while proposing to significantly enhance training and supervision once they start flying passengers.

The initiative, which hasn’t been reported before, lays out a potential alternate path to the cockpit for starting aviators, including time sitting in airliner jump seats as observers, more-frequent proficiency checks by carriers, beefed-up stall-recovery training and a year or more of formal mentoring by senior pilots. Primary elements of the plan were laid out in draft documents and interviews with officials of the Regional Airline Association, the trade group advocating such changes.

With regional carriers pledging to step up both initial and recurrent training programs for new co-pilots, or first officers, the goal is to raise the safety bar while fixing “a broken pipeline” that is already producing too few acceptable applicants, according to Faye Malarkey Black, the association’s president.

“We want all new pilots to be better trained,” she said in an interview Tuesday, adding that proponents “want to see this as an industrywide solution” that is “safer because we leave nothing to chance.”

Aiming to challenge the currently mandated 1,500-hour flight time standard for all U.S. airline pilots -- perhaps the most controversial issue confronting the country’s carriers -- the association over the past few months quietly assembled a package designed to alleviate what its members describe as a worsening shortage of would-be first officers.

Expected to be formally presented to the Federal Aviation Administration after more details are hammered out, the current proposal doesn’t specify alternate flight time requirements for candidates who would participate in individual airline-run programs. At this point FAA policy makers—as well as an agency-sponsored labor-industry advisory committee—appear opposed to dramatic reductions in mandatory experience for average new cockpit hires.

Under provisions previously endorsed by lawmakers and regulators, former military pilots and graduates of four-year college or university aviation programs already can cut minimum-experience requirements by hundreds of hours.

The proposal takes a different tack than another recently disclosed attempt, by JetBlue Airways Corp., to recruit students without any cockpit experience and immerse them in airline-style training to show proficiency can be achieved with far fewer hours than the FAA and Congress now demand.

In the U.S., fledgling pilots usually pay to log hours in smaller aircraft in order to apply for an airline job and then receive training on specific commercial aircraft. But like other critics of the existing regulatory structure, regional airline leaders have argued many prospective pilots are discouraged by the fact that it typically takes several years and often more than $120,000 to build up the necessary hours.

“I don’t think I have a single carrier that has not been impacted” by dwindling pilot availability, said Ms. Black, whose association represents some two dozen regional carriers across North America. They operate roughly half of all passenger flights nationwide.

Details of the package called ACE, standing for air carrier enhanced training, have been disclosed in briefings to lawmakers and regulators.

The plan takes students with time in small airplanes and then subjects them to a training technique widely relied on by foreign airlines but traditionally shunned in the U. S: requiring trainees to sit in jump seats as a way to become familiar with cockpit practices and air-traffic control procedures.

In addition, new co-pilots would be subject to proficiency checks every six months, rather than today’s typical annual schedule. They would fly passengers under the direct supervision of senior captains, called check airmen, for twice as long as they generally do; and would be subject to continuing evaluations by regular captains—and data would be collected from these assessments -- during their first year of employment.

The ACE package also includes more training emphasis on hot-button safety topics such as improving manual flying skills, responding to high-altitude stalls, recovering from extreme upsets and better understanding aerodynamic and human factors principles.

But the Air Line Pilots Association, the largest North American pilot union, remains opposed to wholesale reductions in experience for entry-level aviators. President Tim Canoll has said that preserving the 1,500-hour mandate is one of ALPA’s top priorities. And for years, union leaders have strongly urged FAA officials to resist industry pressure to lower that threshold.

According to Ms. Black, regional carriers gradually have changed some training regimes to reflect greater knowledge and causes of recent accidents. “It is a collaborative effort” with labor and regulators, she said, and “we’ve done some due diligence” to pave the way for the eventual final proposal.

Original article can be found here:  http://www.wsj.com

1 comment:

  1. Malarkey!

    There is no shortage of pilots for regional carriers if regional carriers will pay their pilots a decent wage.


All messages must be civil in tone; if critical, must be constructive. This is a place where we learn what not to do next time. Personal attacks and hate speech directed at the NTSB investigators, FAA investigators, Designated Pilot Examiners, Kathryn, as well as other members of the aviation blog, are unacceptable because they are not constructive. Messages that harass, abuse or threaten other persons, such as threats to cause bodily harm, or that contain obscene or otherwise objectionable content, may result in the loss of your posting privileges.