Friday, April 24, 2015

Attorneys duel over documents in pilot’s lawsuit against Wyndham • Hotel says it needs more time to respond to discovery requests

 
Captain Pankul Mathur



Pankul Mathur has asked a United States District Court judge to order Hospitality Properties Trust and Wyndham Hotel Management, Inc., to comply with requests for documents related to an incident in 2013 in which Mathur says he was robbed at the hotel.

The 46-year-old Boeing 777 captain, in Chicago on a layover on April 15, 2013, says he woke to a loud banging on his door. When he opened the door, a large African-American woman barged into his room, took $500 from his wallet next to the bed, and on her way out told an employee of the hotel she was a prostitute and Mathur had refused to pay her.

He says after he was robbed, hotel staff refused to help him. The woman is seen on security video leaving the hotel. She has never been located.

Mathur’s attorney, Sanjay Shivpur, filed a motion on Wednesday to request the hotel be ordered to answer their discovery requests and produce a corporate witness for deposition.

The hotel says they need more time. On Thursday, Wyndham Hotel Management filed a motion for a protective order and to quash notice of deposition. They say they were only served notice on April 3 and parties have yet to agree on a date for the deposition, at which time a representative of Wyndham would be quizzed about ten topics.

Attorneys for Wyndham say they do not object to presenting a witness but need more time to prepare one on all ten topics.

Mathur has requested numerous documents from the hotel, such as agreements between owner and operator, financial statement, insurance polices, and the real estate deed. He wants to know more about the hotel’s security procedures, policies if a guest is robbed, whether this sort of incident has happened before, where security cameras are located, and whether the hotel has ever considered installing security chains on guestroom doors.

He also want to know more about a man named Andrew Jones, instances when he was at the hotel, and instances when he was told not to come back to the hotel.

Original article can be found here:  http://www.marinacityonline.com

Read the complaint and Wyndham’s response...



 
Hotel 71, now the Wyndham Grand Chicago Riverfront



Lawsuit over alleged robbery at Hotel 71 (Chicago) now in federal court: Air India pilot says a large woman barged into his room, stole his money, and claimed it was for prostitution... Then things got weird 

26-Oct-13 – The lawsuit filed by an Air India pilot who claims he was robbed at Hotel 71 has moved up to federal court. 

 Captain Pankul Mathur, who is a general manager of operations for Air India, says on April 15 after a long flight to Chicago, he awoke at about 10:45 p.m. to someone banging on his hotel room door. When he opened the door, he says a large African-American woman, wearing a black leather jacket and black jeans, pushed her way in, found his wallet next to the bed, and took more than $500.

Pankul Mathur, a native of India who was part of a flight crew staying overnight at Hotel 71, now the Wyndham Grand Chicago Riverfront, says he tried to call the hotel operator but the woman yanked away the cord connecting the handset to the base of the telephone. Out in the hallway on the 15th floor, Mathur says he screamed that he had been robbed but a housekeeper responded it was “not my job to call the police.”

Down in the lobby, full of people and within earshot of diners at Hoyt’s, Mathur says his pleas for help were met with more indifference, a claim the hotel denies.

He sued in Cook County Circuit Court for $50,000 on July 16 but on October 8, the case was moved to U.S. District Court and now Mathur wants $75,000.

The unnamed hotel housekeeper was an accomplice, Mathur believes, based on a comment he is alleged to have made about backing up a claim by the woman that Mathur had called her for prostitution “and was not paying so I am just taking his money.”

He says he got no help from employees of the hotel, including security guards who according to Mathur, followed the woman out the hotel for a few steps, then returned, saying they could not stop her because she was no longer on hotel property. It took him ten minutes, he says, to convince the hotel’s chief concierge, Ben Nelson, to help him call police. When police did arrive, Mathur says the hotel refused to produce the housekeeper who spoke with the woman outside his room.

The entire incident, some of which shows up on security video, played out in less than six minutes. The woman has not been located.

Hotel denies involvement in any crime, says Mathur was negligent

Mathur is suing Wyndham Hotel Management, based in Parsippany, New Jersey, and Hospitality Properties Trust, a publicly traded real estate investment trust based in Newtown, Massachusetts. HPT purchased Hotel 71 in November 2012. The hotel re-opened as a Wyndham on June 12, 2013.

Responding to the complaint on October 15, Wyndham and HPT denied any of its employees were involved with any crime, or refused to help Mathur call police or locate the housekeeper.

According to the hotel, it was Mathur who was careless by allowing a stranger into his room in the first place. It is the mysterious woman who entered Mathur’s room – then disappeared onto Wacker Drive – who is to blame, they argue.

Sanjay Shivpuri of Chuhak & Tecson represents Mathur. Ann MacDonald of Schiff Hardin is representing the defendants. The case was assigned to Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman.

The senior manager of public relations for Wyndham Hotel Group has declined to comment.


Source:   http://www.marinacityonline.com

2 comments:

  1. I think this is one of the most significant information for me. And i’m glad reading your article. But should remark on some general things, The web site style is perfect, the articles is really great : D. Good job, cheers fake documents generator

    ReplyDelete