Monday, February 18, 2013

Spitfire enthusiast spends 28 YEARS building 'perfect' replica of plane flown by his friend during World War Two

A spitfire enthusiast has spent 28 years building a life-size version of the famous fighter plane from scratch.

Terry Arlow, 56, built the 'perfect' replica of a Spitfire Mk. IX, the same one flown by his friend Tony Cooper during World War Two, despite having no engineering skills, after landing on a plan for the aircraft.

He was inspired by the 1969 war film Battle of Britain when a youngster. But it took eight years alone to secure the plans from the RAF museum in Hendon.

In 1990, Mr Arlow set about building the famous fighter and scoured Europe for parts.

With the help of his family, father-of-four Mr Arlow hand-crafted the plane from aluminum and spare parts salvaged from other Spitfires.

Mr Arlow, from Lowestoft, Suffolk, said: 'It was like a jigsaw puzzle. I had to make all the parts from bare materials and then piece them together.

'It has literally taken tens of thousands of hours to make. It has been non-stop really over the 28 years.

'My life has revolved around the project. You're never away from it. Even in my spare time I'd be studying books and doing research to make sure it looked perfect.'

Mr Arlow used aluminum to hand craft each individual part - including the fuselage, wings and tail - while sourcing original parts for the cockpit and detail.

The finished article - completed in 2010 - was so spot on, friend and former RAF pilot Tony Cooper was amazed by the level of detail.

Mr Cooper flew the Spitfire Mr Arlow based his model on, which had the registration number MK 805, on 38 operational missions during WWII.

During his time in the RAF Mr Cooper, who is now 97, served with the 64 Fighter Squadron and was stationed at Harrowbeer

The Spitfire MK 805 became the personal airplane of F/Lt. Cooper and inscribed 'Peter John III', as it was the third Spitfire to carry the name of his son who was born two months before it entered service on July 5, 1944.

  
Read more:  http://www.dailymail.co.uk

No comments:

Post a Comment