http://www.gulfstream.com/news/releases/2012/gulfstream-g650-receives-type-certificate.htm
http://www.gulfstream.com/news/releases/2012/_images/g650_tc.jpg
http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4124/5087135066_c8a6b807b9_o.jpg
Died in a flight test accident at Roswell, NM April 2nd 2011.
Kent Rex Crenshaw 1947-2011 http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/savannah/obituary.aspx?n=kent-rex-crenshaw&pid=150001908#fbLoggedOut
Reece Emil Ollenburg 1962-2011
http://www.funeralhomemasoncity.com/sitemaker/sites/HoganB1/obit.cgi?user=350248Ollenburg
David Ellis McCollum 1963-2011
http://blog.al.com/spotnews/2011/04/flight_test_engineer_david_ell.html
Vivan Leroy Rangusa 1959-2011 http://obit.jacksonvillememorygardens.com/obitdisplay.html?task=Print&id=916436
EDITORIAL: Crash investigation: Nothing to hide
Posted: June 18, 2012 - 7:17pm | Updated: June 19, 2012 - 12:11am
THE WAR of words between federal investigators and Gulfstream
Aerospace Corp. over last year’s fatal crash of a test aircraft in New
Mexico is troubling on several levels.
The National Transportation
Safety Board and Gulfstream must consider themselves teammates, not
adversaries. There’s nothing to hide — and no reason to hide anything
either.
Four crew members died when a G650 aircraft crashed April
2, 2011. Both the government and Gulfstream owe it to the families and
to the public to work together in the ongoing investigation of this
accident, which saddened many in the this community where these aircraft
are built.
Anything less is unacceptable. And, quite frankly, senseless.
On
May 21, Gulfstream went on record and admitted the buck for this
tragedy stops on the company’s desk. In a submission placed last week on
the NTSB’s public docket, the company indicated that it “accepts full
responsibility for the accident.”
That’s pretty clear.
Unfortunately, an exchange of letters that occurred several months prior
to May 21, between Gulfstream President Larry Flynn and NTSB Chairman
Deborah A.P. Hersman, left the impression that the relationship between
the two organizations had devolved into a backroom feud, not a willing
partnership. This makes no sense given the NTSB’s mission and
Gulfstream’s reputation.
The NTSB is an independent arm of the
federal government that has no regulatory or enforcement powers. Its
focus is soley on improving safety — a mission the public has supported
since 1967, when the board was created to investigate all civil aviation
accidents in the United States.
Indeed, Congress took special
care to help the NTSB root out all the facts following any crash. The
board’s analysis of factual information and its determination of
probable cause cannot be entered as evidence in a court of law,
according to the board’s Web site. There’s no reason to lawyer up,
redact names and other information and become combative.
In some
ways, dealing with the board’s investigators is like talking with
priests in confessionals. Information that’s obtained through this
process can’t be used in potential lawsuits — a hugely important
restriction, given today’s litigious world.
Likewise, Gulfstream
is a leading corporate citizen in Savannah and the entire state. Its
management and employees have earned a well-deserved reputation for
their many positive economic and civic contributions to the community
and the region.
So what happened? Why did Mr. Flynn feel the need
to send a letter to the NTSB chairman on March 31, 2012, as well as an
earlier one on Feb. 22, 2012? Those letters triggered a written response
on April 4, 2012 — almost a year to the date after the fatal crash —
from Ms. Hersman. She fired back with a list of concerns raised by NTSB
investigators and managers, including stonewalling and the loss of
evidence.
For example, it was reported that a key piece of
evidence related to the NTSB investigation — the computer hard drive
that contained accident-related telemetry data — was missing.
Investigators routinely comb through hard drives to mine data that may
be important. But in this case, according to the FBI, the hard drive
likely had been “inadvertently discarded in the trash” by a Gulfstream
employee charged with its safekeeping. That’s mind-boggling. How could
such a thing have happened in a presumably controlled enviroment after a
fatal crash?
It’s possible to conclude from the letters between
Gulfstream and the NTSB that the company may be concerned about the
public release of proprietry information during or after the
investigative process.
That’s no small matter.
The G650 is
Gulfstream’s ultra-large-cabin, ultra-long-range business aircraft. It
has a $58 million base price. The market for these high-end products is
extremely competitive. If secrets get out, it could mean lost sales and
jobs.
Mr. Flynn obviously tried to reassure the NTSB chairman in
his March 30 letter, stating that “Gulfstream has fully supported the
NTSB investigation, has behaved with the highest ethical standards and
has at all times made the safety of its flight test and flight
operations its highest priority.”
But it’s equally clear, given
the response from the NTSB chairman just four days later, that concerns
remained. “Litigous behavior frustrates the party process and degrades
working relationships,” Ms. Hersman wrote. “We expect all parties to
work with us toward our mutual goals of fully understanding the
circumstances of the accident and improving safety.”
Two months
have elapsed since those words were written. That’s plenty of time for
the war of words to have ended — and for Gulfstream and the NTSB to be
on the same page, not on different planets.
Job One is to cooperate. Job Two is to figure out what happened in Roswell so that it never happens again.
http://savannahnow.com/opinion/2012-06-18/editorial-crash-investigation-nothing-hide#.UEpw14b3u71
Gulfstream Aerospace Corp.'s ultra-large-cabin, ultra-long-range Gulfstream G650 business-jet aircraft received a type certificate today from the Federal Aviation Administration.
The certification verifies the airworthiness of the aircraft's design. Gulfstream expects to deliver the first fully outfitted G650 business jets to customers before year end. The company has received more than 200 orders for the aircraft.
"The G650 is a superlative aircraft with the most technologically advanced flight deck in business aviation and the largest, most comfortable cabin in its class. In short, the G650 speaks to all that is good about business aviation: safety, security, flexibility, comfort, and capability," said Larry Flynn, president, Gulfstream. "We designed the G650 with significant input from our Advanced Technology Customer Advisory Team, and we're extremely proud of what our entire organization has accomplished with this aircraft."
"The G650 sets the new world standard for business-jet performance, range, speed and comfort," said Jay L. Johnson, chairman and chief executive officer of Gulfstream's parent corporation, General Dynamics. "The Gulfstream team has done an outstanding job in designing and manufacturing what is already the envy of the global market and is sure to become a milestone aircraft in aviation history."
Read Saturday's Savannah Morning News and return to savannahnow.com for the complete story.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment