Saturday, September 20, 2014

Jury sides with plaintiffs in deadly helicopter crash lawsuit: Aérospatiale AS 350B2 Ecureuil, Sundance Helicopters Inc., N37SH

(DISCLOSURE: Sundance Helicopters provides Channel 8's Chopper 8 service) 


 
Pilot Landon Nield


 
Delwin and Tamara Chapman


LAS VEGAS -- A jury has ruled against a Las Vegas tour helicopter company in a lawsuit filed in connection with a crash that killed five people.

The jury found Sundance Helicopters was negligent and that negligence lead to the wrongful deaths of four passengers. The jury awarded the seven plaintiffs $16 million.

Tourists Delwin and Tamara Chapman, both 49, of Utica, Kansas, 28-year-old Lovish Bhanot and 26-year-old Anupama Bhola, a couple from India and 31-year-old pilot Landon Nield died when their helicopter crashed near Lake Mead in December 2011. The group was on a 30-minute sunset sightseeing flight over the Las Vegas Strip and Hoover Dam.

The Chapman's were celebrating their 25th wedding anniversary and Bhanot and Bhola were on their honeymoon.  Sundance Helicopters CEO Bob Engelbracht had the following to say.

“All of us at Sundance are saddened for the families of the victims of this truly tragic accident. Today's jury decision marks the end of a difficult time for everyone involved. We want to thank the jurors for their service and for sacrificing time away from home and work. We also want to assure all in our community that everyone at Sundance Helicopters is committed to achieving and upholding the highest safety standards,” said Bob Engelbracht.
 

The National Transportation Safety Board ruled the crash  was caused by a crucial nut working loose in the rotor mechanism. Officials believe a fatigued mechanic improperly installed the nut during maintenance before the crash.

(DISCLOSURE: Sundance Helicopters provides Channel 8's Chopper 8 service)


SLIDESHOW: NTSB photos of helicopter crash

Story, Comments and Photo Gallery:
http://www.8newsnow.com


NTSB Identification: DCA12MA020
Nonscheduled 14 CFR Part 135: Air Taxi & Commuter
Accident occurred Wednesday, December 07, 2011 in Las Vegas, NV
Probable Cause Approval Date: 02/20/2013
Aircraft: EUROCOPTER FRANCE AS350B2, registration: N37SH
Injuries: 5 Fatal.

NTSB investigators traveled in support of this investigation and used data obtained from various sources to prepare this aircraft accident report.

The Safety Board’s full report is available at http://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/reports_aviation.html. The Aircraft Accident Report number is NTSB/AAR-13/01.

On December 7, 2011, about 1630 Pacific standard time, a Sundance Helicopters, Inc., Eurocopter AS350-B2 helicopter, N37SH, operating as a “Twilight tour” sightseeing trip, crashed in mountainous terrain about 14 miles east of Las Vegas, Nevada. The pilot and four passengers were killed, and the helicopter was destroyed by impact forces and postimpact fire. The helicopter was registered to and operated by Sundance as a scheduled air tour flight under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 135. Visual meteorological conditions with good visibility and dusk light prevailed at the time of the accident, and the flight operated under visual flight rules. The helicopter originated from Las Vegas McCarran International Airport, Las Vegas, Nevada, about 1621 with an intended route of flight to the Hoover Dam area and return to the airport. The helicopter was not equipped, and was not required to be equipped, with any on board recording devices.

The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident to be:
Sundance Helicopters’ inadequate maintenance of the helicopter, including (1) the improper reuse of a degraded self-locking nut, (2) the improper or lack of installation of a split pin, and (3) inadequate postmaintenance inspections, which resulted in the in-flight separation of the servo control input rod from the fore/aft servo and rendered the helicopter uncontrollable. Contributing to the improper or lack of installation of the split pin was the mechanic’s fatigue and the lack of clearly delineated maintenance task steps to follow. Contributing to the inadequate postmaintenance inspection was the inspector’s fatigue and the lack of clearly delineated inspection steps to follow.

No comments:

Post a Comment