Monday, August 08, 2011

National Labor Relations Board case against Boeing Co. in South Carolina has ramifications for Alabama, attorney says.


Alabama -- An attempt by the National Labor Relations Board to prevent Boeing Co. from building a new airplane at a non-union factory in South Carolina could have ramifications for Alabama, panelists at an economic development conference said this morning.

The NLRB and labor unions allege in a complaint that Boeing's decision to move production of its 787 Dreamliner to a $750 million plant in South Carolina represents a blatant attempt to avoid the unions at its operations in Washington state. The work force at the South Carolina plant, which was unionized under a previous manufacturer, voted to decertify after Boeing took ownership.

Marcel Debruge, a partner with the Burr & Forman law firm, said the legal challenge  is unusual because of what the NLRB and labor unions are seeking --  a forced move of production of the airplane back to Washington.

Debruge said if the NLRB and labor unions are successful, repercussions for other right-to-work states could be significant as companies from open union states could find it less tempting to establish operations elsewhere. In a right-to-work state no worker can be forced to join a union.

"Alabama is not that different from South Carolina," said Debruge, who was speaking at a conference held by the Economic Development Association of Alabama.

No comments:

Post a Comment