Wednesday, August 24, 2016

Santa Monica council votes to close the city's airport by July 2018



For decades, residents living around Santa Monica Municipal Airport have complained about the roar of aircraft and worried that some day a Piper Cub or Gulf Stream will come crashing into their living room. 

The Santa Monica City Council first voted to shut down the airport in 1981. That effort stalled before takeoff, but on Tuesday, Santa Monica’s elected officials again pledged to close the historic facility that was once home to Douglas Aircraft Co. but is now the roost of several hundred propeller and jet aircraft, including those owned by celebrities such as actor Harrison Ford.

It won’t be easy, however, as the legal opposition from aviation interests and the federal government has not waned since that first attempt 35 years ago. 

Today, pilots take off and land more than 300 times a day from the general aviation airport, just a few hundred feet from homes in some areas.

After hearing from scores of airport opponents and supporters, the council unanimously approved a resolution Tuesday night to reduce flights and close the embattled airport by July 1, 2018.

“Our council and community, in solidarity, want to close the airport that predominately caters to the 1% that can afford to travel by private jet,” Mayor Pro Tem Ted Winterer said. “There are real legal obstacles, and while we need to be conscientious as we navigate the court system, our resolve to close the airport is firm.”

The resolution contained a package of measures designed to minimize environmental impacts and scale back flight operations, especially those of private and corporate jets, until the airport can be shut down.

They include petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration to reduce the length of the 5,000-foot runway by 2,000 feet on the west side.

The measure also calls for eliminating the sale of leaded fuel, adding security, creating a permit system instead of leases for aviation tenants and stepped-up enforcement of local, state and federal laws related to airport operations.

To help curtail jet operations, the council approved the creation of a city-run operation to replace two private companies that provide aeronautical services such as fuel, maintenance and aircraft storage.

If established, the council hopes to remove incentives for private companies to market their services to the operators of corporate and personal jets. 

Airport opponents say they plan to replace the 227-acre facility with a park that would include cultural events, sports fields and other recreation facilities. 

“The land needs to be transformed from a source of pollution and potential danger into a community asset,” Mayor Tony Vasquez said.

The city, however, faces substantial opposition from airport tenants, local and national aviation groups and the FAA, which cite federal agreements since World War II that require the airport to remain open at least until 2023 if not in perpetuity.

“This decision is misguided and a bad idea,” said John Jerabek, treasurer of the Santa Monica Airport Assn. “It is not in the public interest to close the airport.”

After years of controversy, a federal appeals court in 2011 rejected the city’s attempt to ban certain high-performance jets from the airport.

This month, the FAA ruled for a second time that Santa Monica is obligated to keep the airport open until 2023 to comply with requirements of a $250,000 federal grant it received in 2003. 

“The FAA expects the city to comply with its federal obligations to operate the airport and to provide access to aeronautical users,” FAA officials said Wednesday in a prepared statement. “The FAA will continue to work with the city to ensure the airport remains available to those users.”

City officials say they will challenge the decision in federal court.

Santa Monica is facing another complaint to the FAA that accuses the city of imposing unreasonable landing fees, illegally diverting airport funds to nonaviation uses and setting unfair leasing policies to force out aeronautical tenants. A decision is pending.

In addition, a city lawsuit to free the airport from its federal agreements is scheduled for trial in late 2017 in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles.  A federal appeals court reinstated the case this year after it was dismissed.

Source:   http://www.latimes.com

Cessna 180C, N451SW: Accident occurred September 05, 2016 in Clemson, South Carolina

National Transportation Safety Board - National Transportation Safety Board: http://app.ntsb.gov/pdf

Docket And Docket Items - National Transportation Safety Board: http://dms.ntsb.gov/pubdms

http://registry.faa.gov/N451SW

NTSB Identification: GAA16CA478
14 CFR Part 91: General Aviation
Accident occurred Monday, September 05, 2016 in Clemson, SC
Aircraft: CESSNA 180, registration: N451SW
Injuries: 1 Uninjured.

NTSB investigators used data provided by various entities, including, but not limited to, the Federal Aviation Administration and/or the operator and did not travel in support of this investigation to prepare this aircraft accident report.

According to the pilot of the tailwheel-equipped airplane, prior to the takeoff roll he applied one notch of flaps and added power. He reported that just before rotation the airplane veered to the left and he could not keep the airplane on the runway. He reported that he aborted the takeoff, applied the brakes and the airplane exited the runway to the left and impacted a drainage culvert. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the left wing spar and ribs.

The pilot reported that there were no mechanical malfunctions or anomalies with any portion of the airplane during the preflight that would have prevented the normal flight operations.

The meteorological aerodrome report at the accident airport reported that the wind was out of 100 degrees true at 04 knots at the time of the accident. The pilot departed runway 25.

Arion Lightning LS-1, N481SL: Accident occurred August 24, 2016 at Northeast Florida Regional Airport (KSGJ), St. Augustine, St. Johns County, Florida


Additional Participating Entity:
Federal Aviation Administration / Flight Standards District Office; Orlando, Florida 

Aviation Accident Final Report - National Transportation Safety Board: https://app.ntsb.gov/pdf

Docket And Docket Items - National Transportation Safety Board: https://dms.ntsb.gov/pubdms

Aviation Accident Data Summary - National Transportation Safety Board:   https://app.ntsb.gov/pdf

http://registry.faa.gov/N481SL

Raw video: https://www.instagram.com

NTSB Identification: GAA16CA502
14 CFR Part 91: General Aviation
Accident occurred Wednesday, August 24, 2016 in St. Augustine, FL
Probable Cause Approval Date: 04/10/2017
Aircraft: ARION SKYS OPEN SPORT AVIATION LIGHTNING, registration: N481SL
Injuries: 1 Uninjured.

NTSB investigators used data provided by various entities, including, but not limited to, the Federal Aviation Administration and/or the operator and did not travel in support of this investigation to prepare this aircraft accident report.

According to the pilot of the experimental light-sport airplane, following a personal flight, he made a straight-in approach to runway 13. He recalled that the tower reported the wind as 070° at 12 knots. During the approach, the airplane encountered “convective turbulence,” but he established a stabilized approach over the runway centerline. He remarked that, about 5 ft above the runway, the airplane encountered what he estimated to be a 20-knot or greater wind gust. He reported that the airplane ballooned and touched down on the nosewheel, the propeller struck the ground, and he used differential braking to stop the airplane on the runway. The nose landing gear separated from the airplane, and the engine mounts and the spar box sustained substantial damage.

The METAR at the accident airport indicated that, at the time of the accident, the wind was 040° true at 12 knots. There were no METARs throughout the day at the accident airport that indicated wind gusts. 

The pilot reported that there were no mechanical failures or anomalies with the airframe or engine that would have prevented normal operation.

The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident as follows:
The pilot’s improper landing flare, which resulted in a hard landing.

According to the pilot in the experimental light-sport airplane, following a personal flight he made a straight-in approach to runway 13. He recalled that the tower reported the wind as 070° at 12 knots. During the approach the airplane encountered "convective turbulence," but he established a stabilized approach over the runway centerline. He remarked that about five feet above the runway the airplane encountered what he estimated to be a 20 knot or greater wind gust. He reported that the airplane ballooned, touched down on the nose wheel, the propeller struck the ground, and he used differential braking to stop the airplane on the runway. The nose landing gear separated from the airplane, and substantial damage was sustained to the engine mounts and the spar box.

The meteorological aerodrome report (METAR) at the accident airport, indicated that at the time of the accident the wind was 040° true, at 12 knots. There were no METAR's throughout the day, at the accident airport, that indicated wind gusts. 
========


No one was hurt after a plane crashed at the Northeast Florida Regional Airport in St. Augustine on Wednesday afternoon.

St. Johns County Fire Rescue responded and found that there was no fire hazard.

A spokesperson for the airport said the pilot lost control of the plane due to the wind and landed in the pond.

An FAA spokesperson released the following information:

"An Arion Aircraft, LLC., experimental, amateur-built aircraft veered off Runway 13 after landing at Northeast Florida Regional Airport in St. Augustine, FL, at 3 pm today. The aircraft nose gear collapsed and the propeller struck the pavement. ... The FAA is investigating."

The FAA said only the pilot was on board at the time of the crash.

According to the FAA's website, the plane is registered to Steven Williamson of Jacksonville, but it is not known at this time if Williamson was flying the plane.

Story and video:   http://www.actionnewsjax.com

Baltimore Police Defend Use of Small Airplane to Track, Fight Crime: High-flying cameras, funded by unnamed donor, help solve crimes but also draws criticism

The Wall Street Journal
By SCOTT CALVERT
Aug. 24, 2016 6:43 p.m. ET


BALTIMORE—The Baltimore Police Department on Wednesday defended its use of a newly disclosed airplane-mounted surveillance program, which is run by a private company and since January has employed high-powered cameras that can scan nearly half the city.

“This is a 21st Century investigative tool used to assist investigators in solving crimes,” police spokesman T.J. Smith said at a news conference, likening the airborne cameras to the more than 700 light-pole-mounted cameras around Baltimore. He said footage from the sky helped police arrest a man who is accused of shooting two elderly people in February.

The program, the existence of which was revealed Tuesday by Bloomberg Businessweek, has set off intense criticism from civil liberties advocates and the Maryland public defender’s office. “This is a pretty radical step towards constructing a surveillance society,” said Jay Stanley, senior policy analyst with the American Civil Liberties Union.

Mr. Smith pushed back on assertions that police kept the program secret. “It’s not a secret; we’re talking about it,” he said. Asked why it wasn’t publicized earlier, he said, “We would have talked about it publicly.”

The aerial footage is provided by an Ohio company called Persistent Surveillance Systems. Owner Ross McNutt said a small plane has flown about 300 hours during a trial for the city—100 hours in January and February and 200 hours in a recent two-month span. Mr. Smith said the department hasn’t decided whether to continue the program after the current phase ends in a few weeks.

A wealthy anonymous donor whom Mr. McNutt wouldn’t identify has footed the bill, and company analysts study the images at an office in Baltimore called the Community Support Program, Mr. McNutt said.

The company’s website says it provides “a high level view of the crime scene, the cars and the number of people who were there, where those cars came from and where they went to, and their actions while going to and from the crime scene.”

“We believe we contribute significantly to the safety and support of the citizens here in Baltimore,” Mr. McNutt said.

So far his team has compiled 102 investigative briefs after analysts looked at scenes of serious crimes like murders, shootings and rapes, and fed that information to detectives, he said. “Sometimes they are more successful than others, but I don’t have a firm number” on case outcomes, he said.

Mr. Smith said he didn’t have information on how many arrests resulted from the airplane footage. He emphasized that the cameras lack sufficient resolution to identify individual people on the ground.

Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake said she recently became aware of the program. “This technology is about public safety,” she said in a statement. “This isn’t surveilling or tracking anyone. It’s about catching those who choose to do harm to citizens in our city,”

She added: “I am committed to ensuring that we don’t violate any privacy laws as we use technology to our advantage in fighting and solving crime in the city of Baltimore.”

Paul DeWolfe, the public defender for Maryland, said his office wasn’t informed about the surveillance, which he said “violates every citizens’ right to privacy.”

“It is particularly troubling that the department continues to lack any transparency regarding its technology acquisitions and practices,” he said in a statement, noting a recent Justice Department report that described unconstitutional police practices in Baltimore.

Mr. Stanley of the ACLU said he was troubled by both the lack of disclosure and use of the program, which he said was like putting a GPS tracker on every city resident.

“Can it solve crimes? Yes, I’m sure it can,” he said. “If the government put cameras in everybody’s living rooms and bedrooms, that would solve crimes, too.”

Original article can be found here:   http://www.wsj.com

Stemme S10-VT, N5021: Fatal accident occurred August 24, 2016 in Telluride, San Miguel County, Colorado

Analysis

The pilot was conducting a local sightseeing flight at the time of the accident. A witness reported seeing the powered glider climbing out after takeoff and the engine "sounded perfect." He subsequently heard the sound of a "strained engine" similar to a propeller-driven airplane maneuvering during aerobatic flight. Shortly afterward, the sound of the engine stopped. A second witness observed the powered glider fly by with the engine running. It subsequently went out of sight below the tree line. Shortly afterward, he heard a loud noise that he initially attributed to work going on in the area. However, with thoughts of the low flying glider, he decided to drive to a nearby ridge where he observed the accident site.

A postaccident examination and engine test run did not reveal any anomalies consistent with a preimpact failure or malfunction.

Witness statements and satellite imagery indicated that building cumuliform clouds were present near the accident site. Weather radar data depicted a rain shower over the site about the time of the accident that appeared to be dissipating. With dissipating rain shower activity, the glider was in a favorable area for the existence of downdrafts. It is likely that the pilot encountered a downdraft that exceeded the maximum climb performance of the powered glider.

Probable Cause and Findings

The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident to be:
The pilot's encounter with a downdraft that exceeded the climb performance of the powered glider and resulted in his inability to maintain clearance from the trees. Contributing to the accident was the pilot's decision to fly near building clouds and rain shower activity. 

Findings

Aircraft
Climb capability - Capability exceeded (Cause)

Personnel issues
Aircraft control - Pilot (Cause)
Decision making/judgment - Pilot (Factor)

Environmental issues
Ceiling/visibility/precip - Effect on operation (Factor)

Factual Information

History of Flight

Enroute
Miscellaneous/other (Defining event)
Other weather encounter

Uncontrolled descent
Collision with terr/obj (non-CFIT)

Robert "Glider Bob" Saunders


The National Transportation Safety Board traveled to the scene of this accident.

Additional Participating Entities: 
Federal Aviation Administration / Flight Standards District Office; Salt Lake City, Utah
Stemme AG; Strausberg, Germany
US MotorGlider Inc; Ramona, California
Rotech Flight Safety Inc.; Vernon, British Columbia

Aviation Accident Final Report - National Transportation Safety Board:  https://app.ntsb.gov/pdf

Investigation Docket - National Transportation Safety Board:  https://dms.ntsb.gov/pubdms

http://registry.faa.gov/N5021 


Aviation Accident Factual Report - National Transportation Safety Board 

Location: Telluride, CO
Accident Number: CEN16FA331
Date & Time: 08/24/2016, 1410 MDT
Registration: N5021
Aircraft: STEMME GMBH & CO S10 VT
Aircraft Damage: Substantial
Defining Event: Miscellaneous/other
Injuries: 2 Fatal
Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General Aviation - Business - Sightseeing 

On August 24, 2016, about 1410 mountain daylight time, a Stemme Gmbh S10-VT self-launching (powered) glider, N5021, was substantially damaged during an in-flight collision with trees and terrain near Telluride, Colorado. The pilot and passenger sustained fatal injuries. The glider was registered to and operated by the pilot under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as a local sightseeing flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the flight, which was not operated on a flight plan. The flight originated from the Telluride Regional Airport (TEX), Telluride, Colorado, about 1315.

A witness reported seeing the powered glider climbing out from TEX. The engine "sounded perfect" at a constant power setting at the time. About 15 minutes later, he heard the sound of a "strained engine." It sounded as if there was a "strain on the propeller," similar to a propeller-driven airplane maneuvering during aerobatic flight. About 15 seconds later, the sound of the engine stopped. He subsequently overheard radio communications of mountain staff personnel responding to a downed aircraft.

A second witness observed the powered glider fly by with the engine running. His co-worker commented that the glider seemed to be flying unusually low. It subsequently went out of sight below the tree line. About 10 seconds later, they heard a loud noise, which they initially attributed to work going on in the area. However, with thoughts of the low flying glider, he decided to drive to a nearby ridge where he observed the accident site. He reported the accident to the local authorities.

Pilot Information

Certificate: Commercial
Age: 64, Male
Airplane Rating(s): Single-engine Land
Seat Occupied: Left
Other Aircraft Rating(s): Glider
Restraint Used: 4-point
Instrument Rating(s): None
Second Pilot Present: No
Instructor Rating(s): Glider
Toxicology Performed: Yes
Medical Certification: None
Last FAA Medical Exam:
Occupational Pilot: Yes
Last Flight Review or Equivalent:
Flight Time: 4000 hours (Total, all aircraft), 700 hours (Total, this make and model) 

The pilot's logbook was not available to the NTSB and, as a result, his flight experience could not be determined. The pilot did not hold a current Federal Aviation Administration airman medical certificate, nor was one required to operate a glider. In February 1998, on his most recent application for a medical certificate, the pilot reported a total civilian flight time of more than 4,000 hours. No subsequent applications were on file.

The pilot provided 30-minute and 1-hour sightseeing flights from TEX. Advertisement flyers were available at the TEX fixed based operator. The pilot maintained a website advertising the sightseeing flights. 

Aircraft and Owner/Operator Information

Aircraft Manufacturer: STEMME GMBH & CO
Registration: N5021
Model/Series: S10 VT
Aircraft Category: Glider
Year of Manufacture: 1997
Amateur Built: No
Airworthiness Certificate: Utility
Serial Number: 11-010
Landing Gear Type: Tailwheel
Seats: 2
Date/Type of Last Inspection:  Annual
Certified Max Gross Wt.: 1874 lbs
Time Since Last Inspection:
Engines: 1 Reciprocating
Airframe Total Time:
Engine Manufacturer: Rotax
ELT: Installed, activated, did not aid in locating accident
Engine Model/Series: 914
Registered Owner: On file
Rated Power: 115 hp
Operator: On file
Operating Certificate(s) Held: None 

The pilot purchased the glider in July 2004. A review of the available maintenance records revealed that the most recent entry, dated September 20, 2012, was unsigned. The entry noted the completion of an annual inspection at airframe and engine total times of 1,824.2 hours and 496.3 hours, respectively. 

Meteorological Information and Flight Plan

Conditions at Accident Site: Visual Conditions
Condition of Light: Day
Observation Facility, Elevation: TEX, 9070 ft msl
Observation Time: 1415 MDT
Distance from Accident Site: 5 Nautical Miles
Direction from Accident Site: 315°
Lowest Cloud Condition: Scattered / 6500 ft agl
Temperature/Dew Point: 16°C / 4°C
Lowest Ceiling: Broken / 9000 ft agl
Visibility: 10 Miles
Wind Speed/Gusts, Direction: Calm
Visibility (RVR):
Altimeter Setting: 30.42 inches Hg
Visibility (RVV):
Precipitation and Obscuration: Light - In the Vicinity - Thunderstorms - Rain
Departure Point: Telluride, CO (TEX)
Type of Flight Plan Filed: None
Destination: Telluride, CO (TEX)
Type of Clearance: None
Departure Time: 1315 MDT
Type of Airspace: Class G 

One witness reported light rain and steady surface wind about 8 mph from the northeast about the time of the accident. He stated that there was no thunderstorm activity in the immediate area; however, there was thunderstorm activity across the valley to the north and closer to the airport. Another witness reported that "dark rain clouds" began building near the site about 1 hour before the accident.

Satellite imagery depicted growing cumuliform clouds near the accident site that were moving southeastward at the time. The cloud-top heights over the accident site were about 18,000 feet mean sea level (msl). Weather radar data depicted a rain shower over the site about the time of the accident. The rain shower activity was moving south-southeast and appeared to be dissipating. With dissipating rain shower activity directly above the site at the time of the accident, the glider was in a favorable region for downdrafts.

No Significant Meteorological Information (SIGMET) advisories were in effect for the site at the time of the accident. An Airmen's Meteorological Information (AIRMET) advisory for mountain obscuration due to clouds and mist was in effect at the time of the accident.

A full weather study is available in the docket for this accident case. 

Airport Information

Airport: Telluride Regional (TEX)
Runway Surface Type:
Airport Elevation: 9070 ft
Runway Surface Condition:
Runway Used: N/A
IFR Approach: None
Runway Length/Width:
VFR Approach/Landing: None 



Wreckage and Impact Information

Crew Injuries: 1 Fatal
Aircraft Damage: Substantial
Passenger Injuries: 1 Fatal
Aircraft Fire: None
Ground Injuries: N/A
Aircraft Explosion: None
Total Injuries: 2 Fatal
Latitude, Longitude: 37.893333, -107.833333 

The powered glider came to rest within a small cluster of trees about 5 miles south-southeast of KTEX at an elevation of 11,200 feet. The vicinity of the accident site consisted of mountainous terrain, densely wooded areas, and small meadows. The terrain gradually sloped downhill toward the north/northwest from the accident site. The elevations of ridgelines to the east and south of the site exceeded 12,500 feet.

A postaccident examination and engine test run were conducted by the NTSB investigator-in-charge with the assistance of technical representatives from the airframe and engine manufacturers. The examination and engine run did not reveal any anomalies consistent with a preimpact failure or malfunction. 

Medical And Pathological Information

The Montrose Memorial Hospital Division of Forensic Pathology, Montrose, Colorado, performed an autopsy under the order of the San Miguel County Coroner's Office, and attributed the pilot's death to multiple traumatic injuries sustained in the accident. Toxicology testing performed by the FAA's Bioaeronautical Sciences Research Laboratory, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, was negative for all drugs in the testing profile. No carbon monoxide or ethanol was detected in blood specimens.


NTSB Identification: CEN16FA331
14 CFR Part 91: General Aviation
Accident occurred Wednesday, August 24, 2016 in Telluride, CO
Aircraft: STEMME GMBH & CO S10 VT, registration: N5021
Injuries: 2 Fatal.

This is preliminary information, subject to change, and may contain errors. Any errors in this report will be corrected when the final report has been completed. NTSB investigators either traveled in support of this investigation or conducted a significant amount of investigative work without any travel, and used data obtained from various sources to prepare this aircraft accident report.

On August 24, 2016, about 1410 mountain daylight time, a Stemme Gmbh S10-VT motor-glider, N5021, was substantially damaged during an in-flight collision with trees and terrain near Telluride, Colorado. The pilot and passenger sustained fatal injuries. The motor-glider was registered to and operated by the pilot under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as a local sightseeing flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the flight, which was not operated on a flight plan. The local flight originated from the Telluride Regional Airport (TEX), Telluride, Colorado, about 1315.

A witness hiking between Mountain Village and the St. Sophia gondola station reported seeing the motor-glider under power apparently climbing out from TEX. The engine "sounded perfect" at a constant power setting at the time. About 15 minutes later, he heard the sound of a "strained engine" in the direction of Prospect Bowl. It sounded as if there was a "strain on the propeller," similar to a propeller-driven airplane maneuvering during aerobatic flight. About 15 seconds later, the sound of the engine stopped. He subsequently overheard radio communications of mountain staff personnel responding to a downed aircraft.

A second witness working on the ski patrol shack at the top of the Revelation Lift observed the motor-glider fly by with the engine running. His co-worker commented that the glider seemed to be flying unusually low and it subsequently went out of sight below the tree line. About 10 seconds later, they heard a loud noise, which they initially attributed to other work going on in the area. However, with thoughts of the low flying glider, he decided to drive to a nearby ridge at which time he observed the accident site. He reported the accident to the local authorities.

A third witness driving toward the Lynx building (near lift 13) in Prospect Basin (Bowl), looking directly at Gold Hill, reported observing the motor-glider low on the horizon just above the tree line. The aircraft proceeded south toward Prospect Ridge in what appeared to be a controlled descent. He subsequently lost sight of the aircraft behind a tree line. Although the motor-glider was at a "considerably" lower altitude than he was accustomed to seeing it, it did not appear to be out of control, nor did he perceive it to be in any distress. He and his co-worker subsequently received notification of the accident over their radio and responded to the site.

The motor-glider came to rest within a small cluster of trees in the Prospect Bowl area of the Uncompahgre National Forest/Telluride Ski Area. The accident site was located about 5 miles south-southeast of the Telluride airport at an elevation of approximately 11,200 feet. The vicinity of the accident site consisted of mountainous terrain; densely wooded areas, small meadows and exposed rock. The terrain gradually sloped downhill toward the north/northwest from the accident site. The ridgelines to the east and south of the site exceeded 12,500 feet.

The forward fuselage was oriented on a northwest bearing. The fuselage nose and cockpit area sustained extensive damage. The aft fuselage was separated from, and located immediately adjacent to, the forward fuselage. The aft fuselage was oriented in the opposite direction from the forward fuselage. A tree was positioned between the forward and aft fuselage sections. The branches on the south/southeast side of the tree appeared to have been stripped of branches and bark from a height of about 20 feet above ground level. The southernmost tree in the cluster exhibited a fresh break located about 75 feet above ground level. The empennage, including the rudder and elevators, remained attached to the aft fuselage.

Both wings had separated from the fuselage; they were located immediately adjacent to the fuselage at the time of the on-scene examination. However, local authorities advised that the right wing was initially located over the fuselage and was cut near the root in order to extricate the pilot. The left wing exhibited leading edge impact damage and deformation of the composite structure. The outboard section of the left wing, with the wingtip attached, had separated from the main wing and was located at the accident site. The left aileron was separated and fragmented; it was located at the accident site. The right wing, with exception of the damage at the root and separation of the wing tip, appeared to be intact. The right wingtip was located at the accident site. The right aileron remained attached to the wing.

One of the witnesses reported light rain (sprinkles) and steady 5-8 mph surface winds out of the northeast about the time of the accident. He stated that there was no thunderstorm activity in the immediate area; however, there was thunderstorm activity across the Telluride valley to the north and closer to the airport. Another witness reported that the weather was initially sunny with some clouds and a calm wind. However, about 1300, the weather began to change, with "dark rain clouds" building above Prospect Basin (Bowl) and in the general Telluride vicinity. At 1415, weather conditions recorded at the Telluride airport included a calm wind, with thunderstorms and light rain showers in the vicinity.

Detailed examinations of the airframe and engine are pending. A GPS Secure Flight Recorder (Cambridge Aero Instruments) was recovered at the accident site. Examination of the component and recovery of any retained data by the NTSB Recorders Laboratory is pending.
Robert "Glider Bob" Saunders


The National Transportation Safety Board traveled to the scene of this accident.

Additional Participating Entities: 
Federal Aviation Administration / Flight Standards District Office; Salt Lake City, Utah
Stemme AG; Strausberg, Germany
US MotorGlider Inc; Ramona, California
Rotech Flight Safety Inc.; Vernon, British Columbia

Aviation Accident Factual Report - National Transportation Safety Board:  https://app.ntsb.gov/pdf

Investigation Docket - National Transportation Safety Board:  https://dms.ntsb.gov/pubdms

http://registry.faa.gov/N5021 

Aviation Accident Factual Report - National Transportation Safety Board 

Location: Telluride, CO
Accident Number: CEN16FA331
Date & Time: 08/24/2016, 1410 MDT
Registration: N5021
Aircraft: STEMME GMBH & CO S10 VT
Aircraft Damage: Substantial
Defining Event: Miscellaneous/other
Injuries: 2 Fatal
Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General Aviation - Business - Sightseeing 

On August 24, 2016, about 1410 mountain daylight time, a Stemme Gmbh S10-VT self-launching (powered) glider, N5021, was substantially damaged during an in-flight collision with trees and terrain near Telluride, Colorado. The pilot and passenger sustained fatal injuries. The glider was registered to and operated by the pilot under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as a local sightseeing flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the flight, which was not operated on a flight plan. The flight originated from the Telluride Regional Airport (TEX), Telluride, Colorado, about 1315.

A witness reported seeing the powered glider climbing out from TEX. The engine "sounded perfect" at a constant power setting at the time. About 15 minutes later, he heard the sound of a "strained engine." It sounded as if there was a "strain on the propeller," similar to a propeller-driven airplane maneuvering during aerobatic flight. About 15 seconds later, the sound of the engine stopped. He subsequently overheard radio communications of mountain staff personnel responding to a downed aircraft.

A second witness observed the powered glider fly by with the engine running. His co-worker commented that the glider seemed to be flying unusually low. It subsequently went out of sight below the tree line. About 10 seconds later, they heard a loud noise, which they initially attributed to work going on in the area. However, with thoughts of the low flying glider, he decided to drive to a nearby ridge where he observed the accident site. He reported the accident to the local authorities.

Pilot Information

Certificate: Commercial
Age: 64, Male
Airplane Rating(s): Single-engine Land
Seat Occupied: Left
Other Aircraft Rating(s): Glider
Restraint Used: 4-point
Instrument Rating(s): None
Second Pilot Present: No
Instructor Rating(s): Glider
Toxicology Performed: Yes
Medical Certification: None
Last FAA Medical Exam:
Occupational Pilot: Yes
Last Flight Review or Equivalent:
Flight Time: 4000 hours (Total, all aircraft), 700 hours (Total, this make and model) 

The pilot's logbook was not available to the NTSB and, as a result, his flight experience could not be determined. The pilot did not hold a current Federal Aviation Administration airman medical certificate, nor was one required to operate a glider. In February 1998, on his most recent application for a medical certificate, the pilot reported a total civilian flight time of more than 4,000 hours. No subsequent applications were on file.

The pilot provided 30-minute and 1-hour sightseeing flights from TEX. Advertisement flyers were available at the TEX fixed based operator. The pilot maintained a website advertising the sightseeing flights. 

Aircraft and Owner/Operator Information

Aircraft Manufacturer: STEMME GMBH & CO
Registration: N5021
Model/Series: S10 VT
Aircraft Category: Glider
Year of Manufacture: 1997
Amateur Built: No
Airworthiness Certificate: Utility
Serial Number: 11-010
Landing Gear Type: Tailwheel
Seats: 2
Date/Type of Last Inspection:  Annual
Certified Max Gross Wt.: 1874 lbs
Time Since Last Inspection:
Engines: 1 Reciprocating
Airframe Total Time:
Engine Manufacturer: Rotax
ELT: Installed, activated, did not aid in locating accident
Engine Model/Series: 914
Registered Owner: On file
Rated Power: 115 hp
Operator: On file
Operating Certificate(s) Held: None 

The pilot purchased the glider in July 2004. A review of the available maintenance records revealed that the most recent entry, dated September 20, 2012, was unsigned. The entry noted the completion of an annual inspection at airframe and engine total times of 1,824.2 hours and 496.3 hours, respectively. 

Meteorological Information and Flight Plan

Conditions at Accident Site: Visual Conditions
Condition of Light: Day
Observation Facility, Elevation: TEX, 9070 ft msl
Observation Time: 1415 MDT
Distance from Accident Site: 5 Nautical Miles
Direction from Accident Site: 315°
Lowest Cloud Condition: Scattered / 6500 ft agl
Temperature/Dew Point: 16°C / 4°C
Lowest Ceiling: Broken / 9000 ft agl
Visibility: 10 Miles
Wind Speed/Gusts, Direction: Calm
Visibility (RVR):
Altimeter Setting: 30.42 inches Hg
Visibility (RVV):

Precipitation and Obscuration: Light - In the Vicinity - Thunderstorms - Rain
Departure Point: Telluride, CO (TEX)
Type of Flight Plan Filed: None
Destination: Telluride, CO (TEX)
Type of Clearance: None
Departure Time: 1315 MDT
Type of Airspace: Class G 

One witness reported light rain and steady surface wind about 8 mph from the northeast about the time of the accident. He stated that there was no thunderstorm activity in the immediate area; however, there was thunderstorm activity across the valley to the north and closer to the airport. Another witness reported that "dark rain clouds" began building near the site about 1 hour before the accident.

Satellite imagery depicted growing cumuliform clouds near the accident site that were moving southeastward at the time. The cloud-top heights over the accident site were about 18,000 feet mean sea level (msl). Weather radar data depicted a rain shower over the site about the time of the accident. The rain shower activity was moving south-southeast and appeared to be dissipating. With dissipating rain shower activity directly above the site at the time of the accident, the glider was in a favorable region for downdrafts.

No Significant Meteorological Information (SIGMET) advisories were in effect for the site at the time of the accident. An Airmen's Meteorological Information (AIRMET) advisory for mountain obscuration due to clouds and mist was in effect at the time of the accident.

A full weather study is available in the docket for this accident case. 

Airport Information

Airport: Telluride Regional (TEX)
Runway Surface Type:
Airport Elevation: 9070 ft
Runway Surface Condition:
Runway Used: N/A
IFR Approach: None
Runway Length/Width:
VFR Approach/Landing: None 

Wreckage and Impact Information

Crew Injuries: 1 Fatal
Aircraft Damage: Substantial
Passenger Injuries: 1 Fatal
Aircraft Fire: None
Ground Injuries: N/A
Aircraft Explosion: None
Total Injuries: 2 Fatal
Latitude, Longitude: 37.893333, -107.833333 

The powered glider came to rest within a small cluster of trees about 5 miles south-southeast of KTEX at an elevation of 11,200 feet. The vicinity of the accident site consisted of mountainous terrain, densely wooded areas, and small meadows. The terrain gradually sloped downhill toward the north/northwest from the accident site. The elevations of ridgelines to the east and south of the site exceeded 12,500 feet.

A postaccident examination and engine test run were conducted by the NTSB investigator-in-charge with the assistance of technical representatives from the airframe and engine manufacturers. The examination and engine run did not reveal any anomalies consistent with a preimpact failure or malfunction. 

Medical And Pathological Information

The Montrose Memorial Hospital Division of Forensic Pathology, Montrose, Colorado, performed an autopsy under the order of the San Miguel County Coroner's Office, and attributed the pilot's death to multiple traumatic injuries sustained in the accident. Toxicology testing performed by the FAA's Bioaeronautical Sciences Research Laboratory, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, was negative for all drugs in the testing profile. No carbon monoxide or ethanol was detected in blood specimens.

“Glider Bob” Saunders

NTSB Identification: CEN16FA331
14 CFR Part 91: General Aviation
Accident occurred Wednesday, August 24, 2016 in Telluride, CO
Aircraft: STEMME GMBH & CO S10 VT, registration: N5021
Injuries: 2 Fatal.

This is preliminary information, subject to change, and may contain errors. Any errors in this report will be corrected when the final report has been completed. NTSB investigators either traveled in support of this investigation or conducted a significant amount of investigative work without any travel, and used data obtained from various sources to prepare this aircraft accident report.

On August 24, 2016, about 1410 mountain daylight time, a Stemme Gmbh S10-VT motor-glider, N5021, was substantially damaged during an in-flight collision with trees and terrain near Telluride, Colorado. The pilot and passenger sustained fatal injuries. The motor-glider was registered to and operated by the pilot under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as a local sightseeing flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the flight, which was not operated on a flight plan. The local flight originated from the Telluride Regional Airport (TEX), Telluride, Colorado, about 1315.

A witness hiking between Mountain Village and the St. Sophia gondola station reported seeing the motor-glider under power apparently climbing out from TEX. The engine "sounded perfect" at a constant power setting at the time. About 15 minutes later, he heard the sound of a "strained engine" in the direction of Prospect Bowl. It sounded as if there was a "strain on the propeller," similar to a propeller-driven airplane maneuvering during aerobatic flight. About 15 seconds later, the sound of the engine stopped. He subsequently overheard radio communications of mountain staff personnel responding to a downed aircraft.

A second witness working on the ski patrol shack at the top of the Revelation Lift observed the motor-glider fly by with the engine running. His co-worker commented that the glider seemed to be flying unusually low and it subsequently went out of sight below the tree line. About 10 seconds later, they heard a loud noise, which they initially attributed to other work going on in the area. However, with thoughts of the low flying glider, he decided to drive to a nearby ridge at which time he observed the accident site. He reported the accident to the local authorities.

A third witness driving toward the Lynx building (near lift 13) in Prospect Basin (Bowl), looking directly at Gold Hill, reported observing the motor-glider low on the horizon just above the tree line. The aircraft proceeded south toward Prospect Ridge in what appeared to be a controlled descent. He subsequently lost sight of the aircraft behind a tree line. Although the motor-glider was at a "considerably" lower altitude than he was accustomed to seeing it, it did not appear to be out of control, nor did he perceive it to be in any distress. He and his co-worker subsequently received notification of the accident over their radio and responded to the site.

The motor-glider came to rest within a small cluster of trees in the Prospect Bowl area of the Uncompahgre National Forest/Telluride Ski Area. The accident site was located about 5 miles south-southeast of the Telluride airport at an elevation of approximately 11,200 feet. The vicinity of the accident site consisted of mountainous terrain; densely wooded areas, small meadows and exposed rock. The terrain gradually sloped downhill toward the north/northwest from the accident site. The ridgelines to the east and south of the site exceeded 12,500 feet.

The forward fuselage was oriented on a northwest bearing. The fuselage nose and cockpit area sustained extensive damage. The aft fuselage was separated from, and located immediately adjacent to, the forward fuselage. The aft fuselage was oriented in the opposite direction from the forward fuselage. A tree was positioned between the forward and aft fuselage sections. The branches on the south/southeast side of the tree appeared to have been stripped of branches and bark from a height of about 20 feet above ground level. The southernmost tree in the cluster exhibited a fresh break located about 75 feet above ground level. The empennage, including the rudder and elevators, remained attached to the aft fuselage.

Both wings had separated from the fuselage; they were located immediately adjacent to the fuselage at the time of the on-scene examination. However, local authorities advised that the right wing was initially located over the fuselage and was cut near the root in order to extricate the pilot. The left wing exhibited leading edge impact damage and deformation of the composite structure. The outboard section of the left wing, with the wingtip attached, had separated from the main wing and was located at the accident site. The left aileron was separated and fragmented; it was located at the accident site. The right wing, with exception of the damage at the root and separation of the wing tip, appeared to be intact. The right wingtip was located at the accident site. The right aileron remained attached to the wing.

One of the witnesses reported light rain (sprinkles) and steady 5-8 mph surface winds out of the northeast about the time of the accident. He stated that there was no thunderstorm activity in the immediate area; however, there was thunderstorm activity across the Telluride valley to the north and closer to the airport. Another witness reported that the weather was initially sunny with some clouds and a calm wind. However, about 1300, the weather began to change, with "dark rain clouds" building above Prospect Basin (Bowl) and in the general Telluride vicinity. At 1415, weather conditions recorded at the Telluride airport included a calm wind, with thunderstorms and light rain showers in the vicinity.

Detailed examinations of the airframe and engine are pending. A GPS Secure Flight Recorder (Cambridge Aero Instruments) was recovered at the accident site. Examination of the component and recovery of any retained data by the NTSB Recorders Laboratory is pending.






TELLURIDE, Colo. -  Two people were killed in a glider crash in Telluride Ski area Wednesday afternoon.

One of the victims has been identified as pilot and well-known Telluride local Robert "Glider Bob" Saunders, 64. Saunders was piloting the aircraft when it crashed in Prospect Basin at about 2 p.m. 

The other victim, a Colorado man, was the only passenger in the aircraft, according to San Miguel County Sheriff's Office.

Emergency crews responded to the area to attempt to rescue the two victims, but they were unsuccessful. 

“This is a terrible tragedy and an enormous loss for the families as well as the entire Telluride community. Telluride has lost another great one.” Sheriff Bill Masters said.

“Glider Bob” was owner and operator of “Glide Telluride,” a business offering year-round glider rides around the region out of the Telluride Regional Airport. He has been flying Stemme Motorgliders since 1997, according to his website.

The cause of the crash is unknown at this time and is still under investigation. Sheriff’s Deputies and San Miguel County Coroner are investigating the scene. National Transportation and Safety Board and National Forest Service have been notified. 

A  former Durango man died in a motorized glider plane crash Wednesday near Telluride.

Robert B. Saunders, 64, known to some as “Glider Bob,” was piloting the aircraft when it went down for unknown reasons about 2 p.m. Wednesday in Prospect Basin, which is within the Telluride Ski Resort boundaries, according to a news release issued by the San Miguel County Sheriff’s Office.

A passenger on board, Ronald James Uekert, 66, of South Fork, also died in the crash.

The National Transportation Safety Board arrived Thursday to investigate the crash, but as of Thursday afternoon, there were no clues as to why the plane went down, said Susan Lilly, spokeswoman for the Sheriff’s Office.

Saunders was a longtime glider pilot and flight instructor at the former Val-Air Glider Port in the Animas Valley north of Durango.

He also was a fine woodworker who specialized in cabinetry and furniture at his woodshop in Gem Village, said his longtime friend, George Usinowicz, of Durango. He made the massive wooden front door for the former Farquarhts bar in Durango, which opened with ease hundreds of times a day, millions of times in its lifetime, he said.

“Classical music played in his woodshop while he shaped his wood pieces,” Usinowicz wrote in an email to the Herald.

He also enjoyed dancing, acting and snowboarding.

He moved to Telluride in the 1990s and operated Glide Telluride, which offered year-round flights reaching 14,000 to 15,000 feet in elevation out of the Telluride Regional Airport. He was flying a German Stemme Motorglider, which has its own engine and propeller that allowed him to takeoff without being towed and tucked away under a streamlined nose when not in use.

The crash was reported at 2:11 p.m. Wednesday. First responders said neither man had a pulse. They attempted life-saving measures but were unsuccessful.

“His furniture, his door, his acting performances, his dancing instruction, his glider experiences all remain as heirloom memories, as does the memory of Glider Bob in our hearts,” Usinowicz wrote in his remembrance to the Herald.


SAN MIGUEL COUNTY, Colo. -- A well-known Telluride pilot is among the two dead following a glider crash in the Telluride Ski area, a deputy with the San Miguel Sheriff's Office said Wednesday. 

Robert B. Saunders, also known as "Glider Bob", 64, was piloting a Stemme S10-VT glider when it went down in Prospect Basin in the Telluride Ski area around 2 p.m., said Susan Lilly, a San Miguel Sheriff's Office spokeswoman. The other victim has only been identified as a Colorado man.

"This is a terrible tragedy and an enormous loss for the families as well as the entire Telluride community. Telluride has lost another great one," said San Miguel Sheriff Bill Masters.

The crash was being called an accident by Allen Kenitzer, with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Office of Communications. Circumstances surrounding the crash are unknown at this time. 

Both the FAA and the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) will investigate the crash. 

"Glider Bob" owned and operated "Glide Telluride" which offered year-round glider rides soaring 14-15,000 feet around the region out of the Telluride Regional Airport, Lilly said. Saunders had been flying Stemme Motorgliders since 1997, according to his website.  

It's unclear what circumstances led up to the crash, but Telluride is a high-altitude location, known for being difficult to navigate via the air.