EAGLE — An air travel consultant advised Eagle County to say “not yet” to more direct international flights.
Campbell-Hill’s
Kevin Schorr presented a feasibility study to determine whether the
numbers worked for regular international flights from Mexico into the
Eagle and Aspen airports.
They don’t, at least not right now.
Some
of it’s based on the physical restrictions, such as the kinds of planes
that can fly such distances to Eagle and Aspen with a planeload of
passengers and payload. Those constraints rule out nonstop flights to
and from Europe, Australia, South America and the Caribbean, Schorr
said.
Aeromexico could do it, and connect to 30 other markets
from their Mexico City hub, Schorr said. But to make it work, it would
require daily flights from Mexico City.
“Although passenger
demand patterns may justify three weekly round trip frequencies to
Mexico City during the ski season, the operations and maintenance cost
of an international arrivals facility render the opportunity
infeasible,” the Campbell-Hill study said. “EGE and Eagle County should
not pursue development of an international arrivals facility given the
concerns regarding the financial implications of operating such a
facility.”
They won’t dive into it, but it’s worth plugging away at, said Greg Phillips, Eagle County Airport manager.
“Over
the last several years we’ve seen significant growth in the
international market, not just to the Eagle County Regional Airport, but
the Roaring Fork Valley as well,” Phillips said. “One of the things
they value most is nonstop service,” Phillips said.
The biggest
international growth has been in the Central American and South American
markets. Passengers there, like passengers everywhere, value price,
schedule and nonstop service.
“If we can provide these things, we think it would help drive our market,” Phillips said.
It’s all about the Benjamins
Based
on the existing anticipated market there’s not much chance they’d make
money on it, Phillips. Seven-day service might make money, but the
demand is probably not there yet.
“Even if this turned up roses, the wildcard for us is customs and border protection service,” Phillips.
It
would cost $2.6 million to renovate an Eagle County airport building to
accommodate international travelers and the customs services they’d
need. Then it will cost $400,000-$500,000 a year to subsidize it,
assuming they could get customs agents for the ski season, three and a
half months a year.
“The chances are low of getting customs agents for three and a half month a year,” Phillips said.
It’s
not a consideration for travelers from Canada, who can pre-clear
customs in Toronto or other Canadian cities, before flying to the U.S.
Travelers from Mexico cannot because the U.S. and Mexico don’t have that
sort of agreement.
To make operating an international terminal
break even, international travelers would have to be charged between
$101.64 and $112.89 per passenger, above the fare they’re already paying
— an average of $703 one way into Eagle County and around $740 into
Aspen, Schorr said.
The rule of thumb is that about 15 percent of
Aspen’s international travelers come through the Eagle County Regional
Airport. That’s a traditional rule of thumb, because no one is giving up
their actual data, and Schorr said Campbell-Hill agreed to keep it
confidential as well.
The Eagle County airport sees 170,000 enplanements a year. The peak was 2007 at 232,000.
Between
October 2012 and September 2013, 33,104 international travelers flew
through Eagle. That’s a three-fold increase over 2003, Phillips said.
Most are connecting in Dallas/Fort Worth, (34 percent), Houston (23 percent) and Miami (10 percent), Schorr said.
Latin
America is about 80 percent of the Eagle County airport’s international
traffic, and Mexico City is the top destination, Schorr said.
Aspen
gets more United Kingdom travelers, and most fly from Denver to Aspen
instead of taking a ground shuttle. About 27 percent Aspen’s
international travelers fly transatlantic; 21 percent fly transpacific,
Schorr said.
The international market pumps $23.4 million into
the Vail Valley economy, and about $25 million into the Roaring Fork
Valley economy.
Source: http://www.vaildaily.com
No comments:
Post a Comment